Question 475 of 529
Software Development SecuritymediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is input validation and sanitization, error handling, and authentication. These three are core OWASP ASVS key practices because the standard focuses on verifying that applications securely handle user-supplied data, manage failures without leaking sensitive information, and enforce proper identity verification. On the CISSP exam, this question tests your understanding that ASVS is a framework for application-level security controls, not for infrastructure or password management. A common trap is mistaking network segmentation or password managers for ASVS items—remember that ASVS stays within the software itself, not the surrounding network or user habits. To recall the three correct areas, think of the mnemonic “IEA”: Input, Errors, Authentication.

CISSP Software Development Security Practice Question

This CISSP practice question tests your understanding of software development security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE of the following are key practices in the OWASP ASVS (Application Security Verification Standard) for secure software? (Select exactly three.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Secure error handling and logging

Options A, C, and D are correct. Input validation, error handling, and authentication are core ASVS areas. Option B is wrong because password managers are not part of ASVS. Option E is wrong because network segmentation is infrastructure, not application security.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Secure error handling and logging

    Why this is correct

    ASVS V7 covers error handling.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Integration with password managers

    Why it's wrong here

    Not a specific ASVS requirement.

  • Authentication and session management

    Why this is correct

    ASVS V2 and V3 cover authentication.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • Network segmentation between tiers

    Why it's wrong here

    This is an infrastructure control, not ASVS.

  • Input validation and sanitization

    Why this is correct

    ASVS V5 covers input validation.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related CISSP OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related CISSP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISSP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISSP question test?

Software Development Security — This question tests Software Development Security — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Secure error handling and logging — Options A, C, and D are correct. Input validation, error handling, and authentication are core ASVS areas. Option B is wrong because password managers are not part of ASVS. Option E is wrong because network segmentation is infrastructure, not application security.

What should I do if I get this CISSP question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related CISSP OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.