Courseiva
Security Architecture and EngineeringmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISSP Security Architecture and Engineering Practice Question

A security architect is implementing a system that must prevent conflicts of interest for a consulting firm serving competing clients. Which security model is best suited for this requirement?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Brewer-Nash

The Brewer-Nash (Chinese Wall) model prevents consultants from accessing data of competing clients once they have accessed one client's data.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Take-Grant

    Why it's wrong here

    The Take-Grant protection model is primarily concerned with how access rights can be transferred or propagated between subjects and objects within a system. It defines a set of rules (take, grant, create, remove) that govern the dynamic evolution of access rights. While it addresses access control, its core purpose is not to prevent conflicts of interest, but rather to analyze the reachability and flow of privileges, making it unsuitable for enforcing separation of duties or preventing specific business conflicts.

  • Brewer-Nash

    Why this is correct

    The Brewer-Nash model, also known as the Chinese Wall model, is specifically designed to prevent conflicts of interest by dynamically restricting access based on prior access history. It ensures that a subject who has accessed information from one company within a "conflict of interest class" cannot subsequently access information from a competing company within the same class. This dynamic access control mechanism effectively enforces ethical walls, making it the ideal choice for scenarios requiring the prevention of information leakage between competing entities.

  • Clark-Wilson

    Why it's wrong here

    The Clark-Wilson integrity model focuses on maintaining data integrity through well-formed transactions and separation of duties. It uses constrained data items (CDIs), unconstrained data items (UDIs), transformation procedures (TPs), and certification rules to ensure that data is modified only in authorized ways by authorized users. While it enforces separation of duties to prevent fraud, its primary goal is not to prevent conflicts of interest arising from accessing competing datasets, but rather to ensure the validity and consistency of data.

  • Graham-Denning

    Why it's wrong here

    The Graham-Denning model provides a foundational framework for defining and managing access control rights through a set of eight primitive operations. These operations include creating or deleting subjects and objects, and reading, granting, or deleting access rights for subjects over objects. While fundamental to access control system design, this model focuses on the mechanics of rights management rather than implementing policies to prevent specific business conflicts of interest, making it unsuitable for the stated requirement.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CISSP question from scratch — 747 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.