Courseiva
Identity and Access ManagementmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISSP Identity and Access Management Practice Question

A security analyst is reviewing access rights and discovers an active account belonging to a former employee who left six months ago. This is an example of:

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Orphaned account

An orphaned account is one that remains active after the user has left the organization, posing a security risk.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Orphaned account

    Why this is correct

    An orphaned account is a user or service account that no longer has an active, accountable owner or associated employee, often due to an employee's departure without proper deprovisioning. When a security analyst discovers such an account during an access rights review, it represents a significant security vulnerability as it could be exploited without detection or used to maintain unauthorized access. These accounts pose a risk because they lack oversight and may retain elevated privileges, making them prime targets for malicious actors. Identifying them is a critical part of regular access reviews and identity lifecycle management.

  • Separation of duties violation

    Why it's wrong here

    A separation of duties (SoD) violation occurs when a single individual possesses the authority to perform two or more critical, conflicting tasks that, if combined, could lead to fraud, error, or system compromise. While an orphaned account might indirectly contribute to an SoD issue if it's later exploited, the initial discovery of an account during an access rights review, by itself, does not directly indicate that an individual is performing conflicting duties. The scenario describes an account's status, not a conflict in assigned responsibilities.

  • Account lockout

    Why it's wrong here

    Account lockout is a security mechanism designed to prevent brute-force attacks by temporarily disabling a user account after a predefined number of consecutive failed login attempts. While an analyst might observe an account in a locked-out state, the question describes the discovery of an underlying issue during a review of access rights, not the activation of a protective measure. The scenario implies a persistent problem with account management or ownership, not a temporary state triggered by login failures.

  • Privilege escalation

    Why it's wrong here

    Privilege escalation refers to the unauthorized act of gaining elevated access rights or permissions within a system or network beyond what was initially granted. This typically involves exploiting vulnerabilities or misconfigurations to move from a lower-privileged user to a higher-privileged user, such as an administrator. The scenario describes a security analyst discovering an issue with an account's status during a review, not an active attempt or successful exploit to gain higher permissions.

About these practice questions

This CISSP question is part of Courseiva's 747-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.