hardMultiple Choice
CISSP Practice Question: A company develops a web application using…
A company develops a web application using microservices architecture deployed on Kubernetes. The security team identifies that the application is vulnerable to injection attacks because user input is concatenated into SQL queries. The development team wants to implement a fix quickly. They propose using parameterized queries, but the database access layer currently uses stored procedures. The team considers modifying the stored procedures to accept parameters and using prepared statements in the code. However, the operations team is concerned about performance impact. Which of the following is the BEST course of action?
⚠ Common exam trap
CISSP often tests the misconception that stored procedures inherently prevent SQL injection, or that input validation alone is sufficient — candidates may choose a partial fix instead of a comprehensive one.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Implement both parameterized queries and modify stored procedures to use parameters, and then monitor performance.
The best course is to implement both parameterized queries in the application and modify stored procedures to accept parameters, then monitor performance. This defense-in-depth approach ensures that all database access paths are protected against SQL injection, while the monitoring step addresses the operations team's performance concerns with empirical data rather than speculation.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Use parameterized queries immediately without modifying stored procedures.
Why it's wrong here
Simply using parameterized queries at the application layer is insufficient if the underlying stored procedures themselves concatenate user input into SQL statements. This creates a secondary injection vector within the database logic, bypassing the initial parameterization. The stored procedures must also be refactored to accept and use parameters securely, preventing internal string concatenation vulnerabilities.
- ✓
Implement both parameterized queries and modify stored procedures to use parameters, and then monitor performance.
Why this is correct
Implementing parameterized queries at the application layer combined with modifying existing stored procedures to properly utilize parameters creates a robust, defense-in-depth strategy against SQL injection. This approach eliminates injection vulnerabilities at both the application and database levels. Monitoring performance post-implementation is crucial to identify any potential bottlenecks introduced by the changes before a full production rollout, ensuring system stability and efficiency.
- ✗
Modify stored procedures to use dynamic SQL with input validation.
Why it's wrong here
Relying on dynamic SQL within stored procedures, even with input validation, introduces significant security risks due to the inherent complexity and potential for bypasses. Dynamic SQL constructs can be difficult to secure completely, as subtle coding errors or misconfigurations in validation logic can still lead to injection vulnerabilities. This method is generally discouraged for sensitive operations because it increases the attack surface and maintenance burden compared to static parameterized queries.
- ✗
Use input validation only, as stored procedures inherently prevent injection.
Why it's wrong here
Assuming stored procedures inherently prevent injection is a dangerous misconception, especially if they internally construct SQL using concatenated strings or dynamic SQL. While input validation is a critical first line of defense, it is never a complete solution on its own against sophisticated injection attacks. Attackers can often craft inputs that bypass validation rules, making robust server-side controls like parameterized queries essential for true protection.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 816 original CISSP practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISC2 exam blueprint
This CISSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISSP exam.