Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CCSP Condition keys Practice Question

Network Topology
aws s3api put-bucket-policybucket my-company-datapolicy file://policy.jsonRefer to the exhibit.```"Version": "2012-10-17","Statement": ["Effect": "Allow","Principal": "*","Action": "s3:GetObject","Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-company-data/*"

The exhibit shows a policy applied to a cloud storage bucket. After applying this policy, the security team notices that objects in the bucket are publicly accessible. Which additional condition should be added to restrict access to only authorized applications?

⚠ Common exam trap

ISC2 often tests the misconception that removing the principal wildcard or changing the action alone is sufficient to secure a bucket, when in fact network-level restrictions via conditions (e.g., source IP address or virtual network endpoint) are necessary to enforce access control for authorized applications.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Add a condition that limits access to specific IP addresses or virtual network endpoints.

The bucket policy already grants public access via 'Principal': '*', so removing that principal or changing actions won't fix the underlying exposure. By adding a condition that restricts access to specific IP addresses or virtual network endpoints, you ensure that only requests originating from authorized network sources can access the bucket, effectively overriding the broad principal wildcard.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Add a condition that limits access to specific IP addresses or virtual network endpoints.

    Why this is correct

    Conditions like 'aws:SourceIp' restrict access to authorized network locations.

  • Remove the wildcard principal statement to make the bucket private.

    Why it's wrong here

    Removing the statement would also remove the intended access; better to add conditions.

  • Change the Action to PutObject to limit exposure.

    Why it's wrong here

    PutObject is for writing, not reading; does not restrict read access.

  • Add a condition to require Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).

    Why it's wrong here

    MFA is user-based, not suitable for application access.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CCSP question from scratch — 964 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CCSP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CCSP exam.