Question 336 of 500
Business Continuity, DR & Incident ResponsemediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) agents on all workstations and implementing a security information and event management (SIEM) system with centralized logging. These two actions are most effective for reducing mean time to detect because EDR agents provide continuous, real-time visibility into endpoint activity, instantly flagging suspicious behaviors like unauthorized process execution or lateral movement, while a SIEM aggregates and correlates logs from across the network to surface indicators of compromise within minutes rather than hours. On the ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC exam, this question tests your understanding of detection controls versus prevention controls—a common trap is confusing MTTD with mean time to respond (MTTR) or choosing a preventive tool like a firewall. Remember that detection speed relies on visibility and correlation, not just blocking. A useful memory tip: “EDR spots the sneeze, SIEM connects the cough—together they catch the cold fast.”

ISC2 CC Business Continuity, DR & Incident Response Practice Question

This CC practice question tests your understanding of business continuity, dr & incident response. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO actions are most effective in reducing the mean time to detect (MTTD) a security incident?

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Implementing a SIEM with centralized logging from critical systems

Option B is correct because a SIEM with centralized logging aggregates and correlates logs from critical systems, enabling real-time analysis and automated alerting. This drastically reduces MTTD by surfacing indicators of compromise (IoCs) within minutes rather than hours or days, as manual log review would require.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Requiring multi-factor authentication for all remote access

    Why it's wrong here

    MFA is a preventive control, not a detective control.

  • Implementing a SIEM with centralized logging from critical systems

    Why this is correct

    SIEM correlates events and alerts analysts, reducing detection time.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Conducting annual security awareness training for all employees

    Why it's wrong here

    Annual training helps prevent incidents but does not significantly reduce detection time.

  • Deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) agents on all workstations

    Why this is correct

    EDR provides real-time monitoring and alerts on suspicious activity, reducing MTTD.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Standardizing firewall rules across all network segments

    Why it's wrong here

    Standardization improves security posture but does not directly impact detection speed.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse preventive controls (MFA, training, firewall rules) with detective controls, failing to recognize that only logging and monitoring tools directly reduce the time to detect an incident.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

A SIEM works by ingesting syslog (UDP 514) or Windows Event Log (WEF) data, normalizing it into a common schema (e.g., CEF or LEEF), and applying correlation rules (e.g., 5 failed logins in 60 seconds) to trigger alerts. In a real-world scenario, an attacker moving laterally via SMB (port 445) would generate Event ID 4625 failures; centralized logging catches this pattern across multiple hosts, whereas isolated logs would remain unnoticed until a manual review.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A SOC analyst notices unusual lateral movement in the network at 2 AM. The IR playbook dictates: identify and contain (isolate the affected machine), then eradicate (remove the malware), then recover (restore from backup), then document. Skipping containment before eradication risks the attacker regaining access. Questions like this test the sequence and rationale of incident response phases.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CC question test?

Business Continuity, DR & Incident Response — This question tests Business Continuity, DR & Incident Response — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Implementing a SIEM with centralized logging from critical systems — Option B is correct because a SIEM with centralized logging aggregates and correlates logs from critical systems, enabling real-time analysis and automated alerting. This drastically reduces MTTD by surfacing indicators of compromise (IoCs) within minutes rather than hours or days, as manual log review would require.

What should I do if I get this CC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.