Courseiva
Access Controls Concepts →easyMultiple Choice

ISC2 CC Access Controls Concepts Practice Question

Which principle ensures that users are granted only the minimum permissions necessary to perform their job functions?

⚠ Common exam trap

The CC exam often tests the confusion between least privilege and need-to-know — both minimize access, but least privilege is about permissions/rights while need-to-know is about information access based on a specific requirement.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Least privilege

The principle of least privilege states that users (and processes) should be granted only the minimum permissions necessary to perform their job functions, reducing the attack surface and limiting the blast radius of a compromised account. It is a foundational access-control principle in cybersecurity and is explicitly tested in the ISC2 CC exam. Defense in depth, separation of duties, and need-to-know are related but distinct concepts.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Defense in depth

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth layers multiple independent controls so no single failure exposes the system; it does not limit each user's permissions. Least privilege is the principle that grants only the minimum access needed. Defense in depth would be correct when designing overlapping controls such as firewalls, MFA and endpoint protection.

  • ✓

    Least privilege

    Why this is correct

    Least privilege grants each user only the minimum permissions their job requires, limiting blast radius if credentials are compromised. It directly satisfies the stem's constraint of minimum necessary access, unlike broader models such as role-based or discretionary access.

  • ✗

    Separation of duties

    Why it's wrong here

    Separation of duties splits critical tasks across multiple people to prevent fraud, rather than restricting each user's permissions to the minimum. Least privilege governs permission scope. Separation of duties would be correct when, for example, the person approving payments must differ from the person creating them.

  • ✗

    Need-to-know

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know restricts access to specific data based on relevance to a task, not the breadth of permissions granted. Least privilege is the principle limiting permissions to the minimum required for a job function. Need-to-know is tempting because it also limits access, and would be correct when compartmentalising classified information by project.

Quick reference

AAA Protocol Comparison

ProtocolPort(s)EncryptionTransportPrimary Use
RADIUS1812 / 1813Password onlyUDPNetwork access control
TACACS+49Full packetTCPDevice administration
Diameter3868Full sessionTCP / SCTPCarrier / mobile networks
802.1X—EAP-basedLayer 2Port-based access control

TACACS+ encrypts the entire packet; RADIUS only encrypts the password field — a key exam distinction.

About these practice questions

One of 989 original CC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISC2 exam blueprint

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.