Question 49 of 500
Security OperationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is that the IDS rule is poorly written, generating false positives. This occurs because the rule likely uses overly broad content matches, such as triggering on any packet containing a common SQL string, without including the 'flow' keyword to enforce session state like 'to_server, established'. Without that context, the sensor flags benign traffic—like error messages or routine queries—as malicious, flooding analysts with alerts. On the ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC exam, this tests your understanding of signature tuning and the common trap of confusing alert volume with actual threats; the exam often presents a rule that lacks stateful inspection, leading to false positives. A useful memory tip is “Flow filters false fluff”—if a rule lacks flow keywords, expect noise from non-exploit packets.

ISC2 CC Security Operations Practice Question

This CC practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Possible SQL Injection"; content:"SELECT"; nocase; content:"FROM"; distance:0; within:10; classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Refer to the exhibit. An analyst sees many alerts from this IDS rule. What is a likely cause?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"Possible SQL Injection"; content:"SELECT"; nocase; content:"FROM"; distance:0; within:10; classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000001; rev:1;)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The rule is poorly written generating false positives

Option D is correct because the IDS rule is likely generating excessive alerts due to poor signature design, such as using overly broad content matches or lacking proper contextual filters. Without the 'flow' keyword to establish session state (e.g., 'to_server, established'), the rule may trigger on any packet containing the SQL pattern, including non-exploit traffic like error messages or benign queries, resulting in false positives.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • A web application is vulnerable to SQL injection

    Why it's wrong here

    The rule is not precise enough to confirm an actual vulnerability.

  • An attacker is scanning for SQL injection

    Why it's wrong here

    While possible, it's not the most likely cause of many alerts.

  • The rule is missing the "flow" keyword

    Why it's wrong here

    Missing 'flow' might affect performance but not cause many alerts.

  • The rule is poorly written generating false positives

    Why this is correct

    The rule matches common SQL keywords in normal traffic, causing false positives.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

ISC2 often tests the distinction between a rule triggering due to actual malicious activity versus poor rule design, and the trap here is assuming that many alerts always indicate a real attack (like SQL injection scanning) rather than considering signature quality issues.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In Snort-based IDS rules, the 'flow' keyword (e.g., 'flow:to_server,established') ensures the rule only inspects packets belonging to an established TCP session, reducing noise from out-of-context packets. Without it, a rule like 'alert tcp any any -> any 80 (content:"SELECT"; sid:1000001;)' would fire on any TCP segment containing 'SELECT', including HTTP responses, server errors, or even non-HTTP traffic. Real-world false positives often stem from overly generic content matches that ignore application-layer context, such as missing HTTP method or URI filters.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CC question test?

Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The rule is poorly written generating false positives — Option D is correct because the IDS rule is likely generating excessive alerts due to poor signature design, such as using overly broad content matches or lacking proper contextual filters. Without the 'flow' keyword to establish session state (e.g., 'to_server, established'), the rule may trigger on any packet containing the SQL pattern, including non-exploit traffic like error messages or benign queries, resulting in false positives.

What should I do if I get this CC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.