easyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped
Port Security Violation: Why a Switch Port Goes err-disabled
Exhibit
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 switchport mode access switchport port-security switchport port-security maximum 2 switchport port-security violation shutdown switchport port-security mac-address sticky
Refer to the exhibit. A network administrator configured the above on a switch port. After connecting a single workstation, the port goes into err-disabled state within minutes. What is the most likely cause?
Quick Answer
The answer is that the workstation is sending traffic with multiple source MAC addresses. This is the most likely cause because the port-security configuration sets a maximum of two MAC addresses with a violation mode of shutdown, meaning the switch port goes err-disabled the moment it detects more than two unique source MACs—even if only one physical device is connected. On the ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how port security violation cause err-disabled states, often disguising a virtual machine host or a downstream switch as a single workstation. A common trap is assuming the device itself is faulty, when in reality the switch is enforcing the MAC address limit. Remember the mnemonic: “One device, many MACs—err-disabled attacks.”
⚠ Common exam trap
ISC2 often tests the misconception that the maximum MAC count is the only factor, when in reality a single device can generate multiple MAC addresses (e.g., via virtualization or bridging), causing a violation even with a seemingly generous limit like 2.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The workstation is sending traffic with multiple source MAC addresses.
The port-security configuration with a maximum MAC address count of 2 and violation mode 'shutdown' causes the port to err-disable when a single workstation sends traffic with multiple source MAC addresses. This is a classic symptom of a device (e.g., a virtual machine host or a switch behind the port) generating frames from different MACs, exceeding the allowed limit and triggering the violation.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The workstation is sending traffic with multiple source MAC addresses.
Why this is correct
Exceeding the maximum MAC count triggers violation shutdown.
- ✗
The port-security maximum is set to 2, so it should allow up to 2 MACs; the issue is elsewhere.
Why it's wrong here
If the workstation sends more than 2 MACs, it will still violate the limit.
- ✗
Sticky MAC learning is disabled.
Why it's wrong here
The command shows 'sticky' is enabled, so that is not the issue.
- ✗
The violation mode should be 'restrict' instead of 'shutdown'.
Why it's wrong here
Restrict would not cause shutdown, but the issue is exceeding the MAC limit.
Quick reference
Access Control Model Comparison
| Model | Acronym | Who Controls Access? | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discretionary Access Control | DAC | Resource owner | Small teams, file shares |
| Mandatory Access Control | MAC | System / security labels | Classified govt / military |
| Role-Based Access Control | RBAC | Administrator (via roles) | Enterprise environments |
| Attribute-Based Access Control | ABAC | Policy engine (user + resource attributes) | Fine-grained, dynamic policies |
| Rule-Based Access Control | RuBAC | System rules / ACLs | Firewall rules, network ACLs |
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CC question from scratch — 976 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on CC
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A security administrator is concerned about MAC address spoofing on the network. Which technology can help mitigate this risk by associating a specific MAC address with a port?
medium- ✓ A.Port security
- B.Dynamic ARP inspection
- C.DHCP snooping
- D.VLAN hopping prevention
Why A: Port security is the correct answer because it directly mitigates MAC address spoofing by allowing an administrator to statically or dynamically associate a specific MAC address with a switch port. When a device with a different MAC address attempts to use that port, port security can either disable the port (errdisable) or drop the traffic, preventing unauthorized access. This is a Layer 2 security feature that enforces MAC-to-port binding.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.