Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

ISC2 CC Practice Question: Uses a SIEM to correlate logs from multiple…

An organization uses a SIEM to correlate logs from multiple sources. A rule triggers when a user logs in from two geographically distant locations within a short time. What type of attack does this rule primarily detect?

⚠ Common exam trap

ISC2 often tests the concept of 'impossible travel' as a specific indicator of credential theft or session hijacking, and candidates mistakenly associate any unusual login pattern with brute-force attacks, failing to recognize that brute-force focuses on failed attempts, not successful logins from distant locations.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Credential theft or session hijacking

The SIEM rule detects impossible travel — a user authenticating from two geographically distant locations within a time window too short for physical travel. This behavior strongly indicates that an attacker has stolen the user's credentials (credential theft) or taken over an active session (session hijacking) and is using them from a different location. The SIEM correlates authentication logs (e.g., from Active Directory, VPN, or web apps) with geolocation data (IP-to-location mapping) to flag this anomaly.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Denial of service attack

    Why it's wrong here

    Denial of service manifests as traffic volume or resource exhaustion degrading availability, whereas this rule correlates successful authentication events by location. DoS is tempting because SIEM rules do watch traffic anomalies, but no volume, rate or availability threshold is described here.

  • ✗

    Brute-force attack

    Why it's wrong here

    Brute-force detection keys on repeated authentication failures against one account, not on successful logins from separate locations. The rule matches impossible-travel patterns, so brute-force is tempting because both involve authentication events, but the geographic correlation of successful sessions points elsewhere.

  • ✓

    Credential theft or session hijacking

    Why this is correct

    Impossible-travel correlation relies on the physical impossibility of one user authenticating in two distant locations within the elapsed time. That axis distinguishes credential theft or session hijacking from volumetric attacks, which the rule cannot infer from authentication logs alone.

  • ✗

    Man-in-the-middle attack

    Why it's wrong here

    Man-in-the-middle interception occurs inline between client and server, so the SIEM would see session anomalies, certificate errors or unexpected proxies rather than two successful logins from distant geographies. The rule detects credential reuse across locations, which is a different indicator entirely.

About these practice questions

One of 989 original CC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.