Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

ISC2 CC Practice Question: After a security breach, investigators find that…

After a security breach, investigators find that an attacker exploited a vulnerability in a publicly accessible application to gain access to internal databases. Which security principle would have most effectively limited the impact?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Defense in depth

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Accountability

    Why it's wrong here

    Accountability ensures actions are traceable, but does not directly limit impact.

  • Confidentiality

    Why it's wrong here

    Confidentiality protects data secrecy but does not prevent exploitation.

  • Defense in depth

    Why this is correct

    Defense in depth would have layered controls (e.g., segmentation, IDS) to limit the attacker's lateral movement.

  • Non-repudiation

    Why it's wrong here

    Non-repudiation provides evidence of actions, but does not prevent or contain breaches.

About these practice questions

This CC question is part of Courseiva's 976-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.