Question 253 of 500
Security PrincipleshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is defense in depth, as mutual authentication between every component before communication exemplifies layered security controls. Defense in depth relies on multiple, overlapping safeguards so that if one layer fails, another still protects the system; requiring each component to authenticate to every other component adds a distinct layer of verification that an attacker must bypass. On the ISC2 Certified in Cybersecurity CC exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish defense in depth from other principles like zero trust, least privilege, or separation of duties—a common trap is confusing the mutual authentication mechanism with the zero trust model, but remember that zero trust is an architectural approach, while defense in depth is the overarching principle of using multiple layers, of which mutual authentication is just one. A useful memory tip: think of a castle with a moat, walls, guards, and locked doors—each layer must be passed, just as every component must authenticate before communicating.

ISC2 CC Security Principles Practice Question

This CC practice question tests your understanding of security principles. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security professional is evaluating a system that uses a trust model where every component authenticates to each other before communicating. Which security principle does this model exemplify?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Defense in depth

Correct: A - Defense in depth. While zero trust is a model, defense in depth is the principle of multiple layers; mutual authentication is one layer. Option B is wrong because least privilege is about access rights. Option C is wrong because separation of duties divides roles. Option D is wrong because non-repudiation prevents denial.

Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Least privilege

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege limits access, not authentication.

  • Separation of duties

    Why it's wrong here

    Separation of duties divides responsibilities.

  • Non-repudiation

    Why it's wrong here

    Non-repudiation prevents denial.

  • Defense in depth

    Why this is correct

    Mutual authentication adds a layer of security, exemplifying defense in depth.

    Related concept

    Authentication checks who the user is.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Key takeaway

Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CC questions on access control and AAA configuration.

Related practice questions

Related CC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CC question test?

Security Principles — This question tests Security Principles — Authentication checks who the user is..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Defense in depth — Correct: A - Defense in depth. While zero trust is a model, defense in depth is the principle of multiple layers; mutual authentication is one layer. Option B is wrong because least privilege is about access rights. Option C is wrong because separation of duties divides roles. Option D is wrong because non-repudiation prevents denial.

What should I do if I get this CC question wrong?

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CC questions on access control and AAA configuration.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Authentication checks who the user is.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.