Question 564 of 1,000
Access Controls ConceptsmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

ISC2 CC Access Controls Concepts Practice Question

This CC practice question tests your understanding of access controls concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security auditor is reviewing access controls at a financial institution. The auditor identifies a scenario where one employee can initiate a payment transaction, and the same employee can also approve it. Which access control principle is being violated, and what is the primary risk?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Separation of duties; risk of fraud

Separation of duties requires that no single person has the ability to complete a high-risk action without another person's involvement. The scenario describes a violation of this principle, which increases the risk of fraud because an individual could both initiate and approve a fraudulent payment without oversight.

Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Separation of duties; risk of fraud

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Separation of duties prevents a single person from performing conflicting tasks, reducing fraud risk.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Authentication checks who the user is.

  • Defense in depth; risk of single point of failure

    Why it's wrong here

    Defense in depth involves multiple layers of control, not task segregation.

  • Need-to-know; risk of data exposure

    Why it's wrong here

    Need-to-know limits access to data based on job necessity, not task segregation.

  • Least privilege; risk of excessive permissions

    Why it's wrong here

    Least privilege is about granting minimum permissions, not about splitting tasks among individuals.

  • Privileged access management; risk of account compromise

    Why it's wrong here

    PAM focuses on controlling and monitoring privileged accounts, not on dividing responsibilities.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Key takeaway

Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CC questions on access control and AAA configuration.

Related practice questions

Related CC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CC question test?

Access Controls Concepts — This question tests Access Controls Concepts — Authentication checks who the user is..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Separation of duties; risk of fraud — Separation of duties requires that no single person has the ability to complete a high-risk action without another person's involvement. The scenario describes a violation of this principle, which increases the risk of fraud because an individual could both initiate and approve a fraudulent payment without oversight.

What should I do if I get this CC question wrong?

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CC questions on access control and AAA configuration.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Authentication checks who the user is.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.