Courseiva
Security Principles →hardMultiple Choice

ISC2 CC Security Principles Practice Question

A hospital's compliance officer is mapping controls for a new patient portal. The legal team wants documented assurance that a clinician cannot later deny having approved a medication order submitted through the portal. Which security principle is the legal team most directly requesting?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is choosing integrity because the order record must remain unchanged, when the actual requirement is proving which clinician performed the action.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Non-repudiation

The legal team needs proof of who performed an action so it cannot be denied later. That is non-repudiation, usually achieved with digital signatures, strong authentication, and tamper-evident audit logging tied to individual identities. Integrity protects against unauthorized changes, confidentiality protects against disclosure, and availability protects against loss of access; none of these establishes undeniable authorship of the medication order.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Integrity

    Why it's wrong here

    Integrity ensures data is not altered improperly, which would prevent an order from being changed after submission. However, the legal team's concern is not that the order was tampered with; it is that the clinician could deny submitting it. Integrity controls like checksums or digital signatures can support non-repudiation, but integrity alone does not prove who performed the action.

  • ✗

    Availability

    Why it's wrong here

    Availability ensures the portal and patient records are accessible when clinicians need them. It addresses uptime, redundancy, and disaster recovery, none of which prove authorship of an order. A highly available portal could still lack the cryptographic evidence needed to stop a clinician from repudiating a submitted medication approval.

  • ✓

    Non-repudiation

    Why this is correct

    Non-repudiation provides irrefutable evidence that a specific identity performed a specific action, so the clinician cannot credibly deny approving the order. Digital signatures and tamper-evident audit logs bound to the clinician's authenticated identity deliver this proof. The legal team wants documented assurance of authorship and approval, which is precisely what non-repudiation supplies in a dispute.

  • ✗

    Confidentiality

    Why it's wrong here

    Confidentiality restricts access to patient data so only authorized parties can view it. While critical in healthcare under HIPAA, it does not establish who approved a medication order. Encrypting the portal or limiting access would protect privacy but would not prevent a clinician from later denying that they authorized a specific order.

About these practice questions

One of 989 original CC practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISC2 exam blueprint

This CC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CC exam.