Question 215 of 500
IT Risk AssessmenthardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is brainstorming sessions and SWOT analysis. These are both valid techniques for identifying risk in IT risk assessment because they systematically uncover threats and vulnerabilities from different angles. Brainstorming leverages group creativity to surface unknown risks, while SWOT analysis provides a structured framework to examine internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats, directly revealing where risks may emerge. On the CRISC exam, this question tests your understanding of recognized risk identification methods versus informal or post-assessment tools; a common trap is confusing risk identification with risk analysis or response techniques. Remember that identification is about discovery, not evaluation. A useful memory tip is to think of “SWOT and Brainstorm” as the discovery duo—one maps the landscape, the other digs for hidden gems.

CRISC IT Risk Assessment Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of it risk assessment. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are valid techniques for identifying risk in IT risk assessment?

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

SWOT analysis

SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) is a structured technique used to identify both internal and external risk factors during IT risk assessment. It helps uncover threats that could exploit weaknesses, as well as opportunities that might mitigate risks, making it a valid identification method.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • SWOT analysis

    Why this is correct

    SWOT helps identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Brainstorming sessions

    Why this is correct

    Brainstorming is a qualitative technique to identify risks.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Residual risk assessment

    Why it's wrong here

    Residual risk is evaluated after controls are applied.

  • Risk aggregation

    Why it's wrong here

    Risk aggregation combines risks, not identifies them.

  • Monte Carlo simulation

    Why it's wrong here

    Monte Carlo is used for quantitative analysis, not identification.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is confusing risk identification techniques (like SWOT and brainstorming) with risk analysis or evaluation techniques (like residual risk assessment, risk aggregation, and Monte Carlo simulation), which are applied after risks have already been identified.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

SWOT analysis is often used in strategic planning and can be applied to IT risk assessment by mapping technical vulnerabilities (weaknesses) against emerging threats like zero-day exploits or regulatory changes. Brainstorming sessions leverage group creativity to surface risks such as misconfigured cloud storage or insider threats, often using structured prompts like 'what if' scenarios. Both techniques are qualitative and rely on expert judgment, contrasting with quantitative methods like Monte Carlo that require historical data and statistical modeling.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CRISC exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

IT Risk Assessment — This question tests IT Risk Assessment — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: SWOT analysis — SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) is a structured technique used to identify both internal and external risk factors during IT risk assessment. It helps uncover threats that could exploit weaknesses, as well as opportunities that might mitigate risks, making it a valid identification method.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.