Question 237 of 500
Risk and Control Monitoring and ReportingeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CRISC Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of risk and control monitoring and reporting. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An organization uses control self-assessments (CSAs) as part of its monitoring program. The results from the latest CSA show that the majority of controls are rated as effective, but an internal audit reveals several control failures in those same areas. What is the MOST likely reason for this discrepancy?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

CSA respondents may have a bias toward reporting favorable results

Option A is correct because CSAs may be biased if self-assessed by control owners. Option B is wrong because documentation errors would affect both. Option C is wrong because inherent risk changes would not affect control effectiveness assessment. Option D is wrong because the scope of CSA is typically broader, not narrower.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The CSA scope was narrower than the audit scope

    Why it's wrong here

    CSA scope is usually broader; narrower scope would not cause discrepancy.

  • The CSA questionnaire contained documentation errors

    Why it's wrong here

    Errors would likely affect all responses, not just cause favorable bias.

  • The inherent risk level of the processes decreased after the CSA

    Why it's wrong here

    Inherent risk change does not directly affect control effectiveness ratings.

  • CSA respondents may have a bias toward reporting favorable results

    Why this is correct

    Self-assessment can lead to overly optimistic ratings.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CRISC exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related CRISC OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting — This question tests Risk and Control Monitoring and Reporting — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: CSA respondents may have a bias toward reporting favorable results — Option A is correct because CSAs may be biased if self-assessed by control owners. Option B is wrong because documentation errors would affect both. Option C is wrong because inherent risk changes would not affect control effectiveness assessment. Option D is wrong because the scope of CSA is typically broader, not narrower.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related CRISC OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.