CRISC Risk Response and Reporting Practice Question
An organization is integrating IT risk into its enterprise risk management (ERM) program. What is the primary benefit of this integration?
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is that candidates mistakenly think integration means IT risks are eliminated or that IT can ignore business context, when in fact integration demands that IT risks be translated into business impact terms to drive appropriate control decisions.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
It ensures IT risks are viewed in the context of business objectives
Integrating IT risk into enterprise risk management (ERM) ensures that IT risks are evaluated in the context of business objectives, enabling prioritization of risk responses that align with strategic goals. This alignment prevents IT from operating in a silo and ensures that risk decisions support overall business value, not just technical compliance.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
It allows IT to operate independently
Why it's wrong here
ERM integration requires IT risk to be governed within the same framework and reporting lines as other risks, not operated independently. Independence is tempting because IT teams often own technical risk assessment, but the integration's purpose is alignment with enterprise appetite and objectives.
- ✗
It eliminates all IT risks
Why it's wrong here
Integration cannot eliminate risk; it provides visibility of IT risk alongside other enterprise risks so it is owned and treated consistently. Elimination is impossible because residual risk always remains. It tempts because ERM does aim to reduce surprises, and full risk removal would be the right expectation only for a control that neutralises a specific threat.
- ✗
It reduces the need for IT controls
Why it's wrong here
Integration does not remove the need for controls; controls remain the mechanism that treats identified IT risk within tolerance. The option tempts because ERM improves risk visibility and prioritisation, which can feel like less control effort, yet reducing controls increases exposure rather than managing it.
- ✓
It ensures IT risks are viewed in the context of business objectives
Why this is correct
Integrating IT risk into ERM translates technical exposures into business-impact terms, so leadership evaluates them alongside strategic, financial and operational risks. This satisfies the stem's primary-benefit requirement by ensuring IT risks are assessed against business objectives rather than managed in an isolated technical silo.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CRISC question from scratch — 1,062 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.