Question 393 of 500
Risk Response and MitigationhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is risk reduction by implementing redundant systems. This is the most appropriate strategy because redundant systems directly address the extremely high downtime costs by eliminating single points of failure, thereby reducing both the likelihood and the operational impact of a system outage. On the Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control CRISC exam, this scenario tests your ability to distinguish risk reduction from other responses like risk transfer or avoidance; a common trap is choosing insurance, but insurance only provides financial compensation after the loss and does not prevent the costly downtime itself. Remember the memory tip: when downtime costs are high, you need to keep the system running, not just pay for the break.

CRISC Risk Response and Mitigation Practice Question

This CRISC practice question tests your understanding of risk response and mitigation. Compare every option against the stated constraints before choosing — the best answer satisfies all requirements, not just the most obvious one. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A multinational organization is implementing a risk mitigation strategy for a critical system. The business impact analysis shows that downtime costs are extremely high. Which risk response strategy is MOST appropriate for this scenario?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Risk reduction by implementing redundant systems

Given the extremely high downtime costs, the most appropriate risk response is risk reduction through implementing redundant systems. This directly addresses the critical system's availability requirement by eliminating single points of failure, thereby reducing both the likelihood and impact of downtime. Decommissioning the system (avoidance) would eliminate the business function entirely, which is typically not viable for a critical system, while insurance (transfer) only provides financial compensation after the loss, not preventing the operational impact of downtime.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Risk avoidance by decommissioning the system

    Why it's wrong here

    Avoidance is too extreme; the system is critical.

  • Risk transfer through cyber insurance

    Why it's wrong here

    Insurance covers financial loss but not operational downtime.

  • Risk reduction by implementing redundant systems

    Why this is correct

    Redundancy reduces both likelihood and impact of downtime.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Risk acceptance because mitigation is too costly

    Why it's wrong here

    Acceptance is not appropriate due to high downtime costs.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse risk transfer (insurance) as a primary solution for high downtime costs, overlooking that insurance does not prevent the operational impact and lost revenue during the outage itself, which is the core concern in this scenario.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Implementing redundant systems often involves active-passive or active-active clustering configurations, such as using a load balancer with health checks (e.g., via TCP or HTTP probes) to automatically failover traffic to a standby node. In a real-world scenario, a financial trading platform might deploy a hot standby database with synchronous replication (e.g., using Oracle Data Guard with maximum protection mode) to achieve a Recovery Point Objective (RPO) of zero and a Recovery Time Objective (RTO) of seconds, directly mitigating the high cost of downtime.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CRISC practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CRISC practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CRISC question test?

Risk Response and Mitigation — This question tests Risk Response and Mitigation — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Risk reduction by implementing redundant systems — Given the extremely high downtime costs, the most appropriate risk response is risk reduction through implementing redundant systems. This directly addresses the critical system's availability requirement by eliminating single points of failure, thereby reducing both the likelihood and impact of downtime. Decommissioning the system (avoidance) would eliminate the business function entirely, which is typically not viable for a critical system, while insurance (transfer) only provides financial compensation after the loss, not preventing the operational impact of downtime.

What should I do if I get this CRISC question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.