hardMultiple Choice
CRISC Practice Question: A large enterprise uses a risk matrix with impact…
A large enterprise uses a risk matrix with impact categories (very low, low, medium, high, very high) and likelihood (rare, unlikely, possible, likely, almost certain). A risk identified has a 'likely' likelihood and 'high' impact. According to the matrix, risks with this combination are classified as 'high' risk. The risk appetite statement requires that all high risks have a response plan within 30 days. However, the risk owner argues that due to effective compensating controls, the residual risk is only 'medium'. Which of the following is the BEST course of action?
⚠ Common exam trap
CRISC often tests the misconception that effective compensating controls can bypass policy requirements for high risks, leading candidates to choose acceptance or deadline extension instead of formalizing the required response plan.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Formalize the risk treatment plan and include the compensating controls in the risk register.
The risk appetite statement mandates that all high risks have a response plan within 30 days. Even if the risk owner argues residual risk is medium due to compensating controls, the initial risk classification is high, so a formal risk treatment plan must be created and the compensating controls documented in the risk register. This ensures compliance with policy and provides a clear record.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Formalize the risk treatment plan and include the compensating controls in the risk register.
Why this is correct
Formalizing the risk treatment plan and including the compensating controls in the risk register is the best action. It documents the residual risk as medium and satisfies the requirement for a response plan within 30 days.
- ✗
Implement additional controls to ensure the residual risk becomes low.
Why it's wrong here
Implementing additional controls is unnecessary if the residual risk is already within the risk appetite. This action does not address the need to document the controls and the residual risk.
- ✗
Accept the risk as is, since controls reduce it to acceptable level.
Why it's wrong here
Accepting the risk as is without formal documentation does not meet the requirement that high risks have a response plan. The residual risk should be formally recorded.
- ✗
Document the residual risk as medium and extend the response deadline beyond 30 days.
Why it's wrong here
Documenting the residual risk as medium is appropriate, but extending the deadline is not necessary. Instead, a formal risk treatment plan should be documented, which can include the compensating controls.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CRISC question from scratch — 1,062 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official ISACA exam blueprint
This CRISC practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CRISC exam.