Question 89 of 509
Protection of Information AssetsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to configure the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports. This is correct because dual control and split knowledge must be enforced at the technical level, not merely through procedural policy; when the HSM itself mandates two-factor physical presence for critical operations like key export, it eliminates the risk of a single administrator bypassing controls, as seen in the audit log where one administrator exported a key with only after-the-fact email approval. On the CISA exam, this scenario tests your understanding that compensating technical controls are superior to administrative controls when enforcing segregation of duties for cryptographic systems—a common trap is choosing a procedural fix like “retrain staff” or “update policy,” which fails to address the root cause of technical vulnerability. Remember the mnemonic: “Policy without enforcement is just a suggestion; for HSMs, dual control must be a technical requirement, not a procedural request.”

CISA Protection of Information Assets Practice Question

This CISA practice question tests your understanding of protection of information assets. Examine the command output carefully: the correct answer depends on what the output actually shows, not on general recall alone. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

You are an IS auditor for a financial institution that processes credit card payments. The organization uses a key management system (KMS) to store encryption keys for point-of-sale (POS) data. The KMS is a hardware security module (HSM) located in a secured data center. The audit reveals that the HSM is administered by two individuals who both have full access to the HSM, including the ability to export keys. The organization has a policy requiring split knowledge and dual control for key management, but in practice, the two administrators often perform key ceremonies alone due to scheduling conflicts. The logs show that one administrator exported a key last month without the other present, and the export was approved via email by the other administrator after the fact. Which of the following is the BEST corrective action?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Configure the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports

The HSM must enforce split knowledge and dual control at the technical level, not rely on procedural compliance. By configuring the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports, the organization ensures that no single individual can export keys, directly addressing the policy violation and the log evidence of a solo export. This technical control is the most effective corrective action because it prevents the bypass of dual control even if administrators attempt to circumvent procedures.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Reduce the number of administrators to one to simplify accountability

    Why it's wrong here

    Single administrator violates segregation of duties.

  • Configure the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports

    Why this is correct

    Technical enforcement ensures dual control.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Provide training to administrators on the importance of dual control

    Why it's wrong here

    Training may not be sufficient without enforcement.

  • Implement automated key rotation every 90 days

    Why it's wrong here

    Rotation does not enforce dual control.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may choose training (Option C) as a quick fix, overlooking that the root cause is a lack of technical enforcement, not a lack of awareness.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

HSMs like those from Thales or Utimaco support multi-person authentication (e.g., M of N quorum) where key export operations require a minimum number of authorized administrators to present their smart cards or PINs simultaneously. In practice, the HSM's access control lists (ACLs) and operation policies can be configured to enforce that key export commands (e.g., using PKCS#11 C_Unwrap or vendor-specific APIs) fail unless the required number of administrators authenticate within a short time window. This ensures that even if an administrator attempts to export a key alone, the HSM hardware will reject the operation.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CISA exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CISA practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CISA practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CISA question test?

Protection of Information Assets — This question tests Protection of Information Assets — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Configure the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports — The HSM must enforce split knowledge and dual control at the technical level, not rely on procedural compliance. By configuring the HSM to require two administrators to be physically present for key exports, the organization ensures that no single individual can export keys, directly addressing the policy violation and the log evidence of a solo export. This technical control is the most effective corrective action because it prevents the bypass of dual control even if administrators attempt to circumvent procedures.

What should I do if I get this CISA question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.