Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CISA Practice Question: During user acceptance testing (UAT) of a new…

During user acceptance testing (UAT) of a new financial system, users report that the system fails to enforce a segregation of duties rule where the same user should not be able to create a purchase order and approve it. The requirement was documented in the functional specifications. Which of the following is the MOST likely cause of this issue?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently assume the issue is due to incomplete or ambiguous requirements (options B or C) when the requirement was clearly documented, but the real cause is a failure to configure the control in the system's security settings.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The system was not configured to enforce the control.

The segregation of duties (SoD) rule is a functional control that must be explicitly configured in the system's authorization or workflow engine. Since the requirement was documented in the functional specifications, the most likely cause is that the system was not configured to enforce the control, meaning the access control list (ACL) or role-based access control (RBAC) settings did not prevent the same user from both creating and approving a purchase order.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Performance testing was prioritized over functional testing.

    Why it's wrong here

    Performance testing does not affect functional control enforcement.

  • The functional requirements were incomplete.

    Why it's wrong here

    The requirement was documented, so incomplete requirements are not the cause.

  • The requirements were ambiguous and misinterpreted by developers.

    Why it's wrong here

    Ambiguity could cause misinterpretation, but the requirement was clearly documented.

  • The system was not configured to enforce the control.

    Why this is correct

    The system likely has the capability but was not properly configured.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

Quick reference

Access Control Model Comparison

ModelAcronymWho Controls Access?Best For
Discretionary Access ControlDACResource ownerSmall teams, file shares
Mandatory Access ControlMACSystem / security labelsClassified govt / military
Role-Based Access ControlRBACAdministrator (via roles)Enterprise environments
Attribute-Based Access ControlABACPolicy engine (user + resource attributes)Fine-grained, dynamic policies
Rule-Based Access ControlRuBACSystem rules / ACLsFirewall rules, network ACLs

About these practice questions

This CISA question is part of Courseiva's 995-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.