Courseiva
easyMultiple Select

CISA Practice Question: During the system development life cycle (SDLC),…

During the system development life cycle (SDLC), which THREE of the following are recognized benefits of involving internal audit early in the process?

⚠ Common exam trap

Many exam-takers confuse 'reduced need for future audits' (a false benefit) with 'enhanced assurance' (a real benefit), or assume that early audit involvement reduces testing effort, when in fact it may increase the scope of validation to ensure controls are properly designed and implemented.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Lower cost of implementing controls due to early design changes.

Option B is correct because involving internal audit during the design phase allows control requirements to be identified and incorporated while changes are still inexpensive, avoiding costly rework later in the SDLC when modifications become far more expensive. Option D is correct because early audit involvement surfaces potential control weaknesses during design and development, before they become embedded in the system and are much harder and costlier to remediate. Option E is correct because audit participation in the design phase provides assurance that necessary controls are built directly into the system architecture rather than bolted on afterward. Option A is not correct because early internal audit involvement does not eliminate or reduce the need for future independent audits, which remain necessary for objective assurance. Option C is not correct because early audit involvement does not reduce the number of system tests required; testing scope is driven by system complexity, risk, and requirements, not by audit's early participation.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Reduced need for future independent audits.

    Why it's wrong here

    Internal audit remains independent, so early involvement informs and advises but never removes the need for subsequent independent audit work; it may reduce reliance on later testing, not the audits themselves. Reduced future audits would apply only if audit lost its independence by owning controls.

  • ✓

    Lower cost of implementing controls due to early design changes.

    Why this is correct

    Audit involvement during requirements and design lets control requirements be built into the system rather than retrofitted, avoiding costly rework and remediation after implementation. Catching design gaps early directly reduces the expense of implementing controls.

  • ✗

    Reduction in the number of system tests required.

    Why it's wrong here

    Internal audit involvement adds control reviews and risk assessments; it does not remove or reduce the testing the project team must perform. It is tempting because audit can identify control gaps that let developers streamline test coverage, but the SDLC benefit is improved control design, not fewer system tests.

  • ✓

    Identification of potential control weaknesses before they are ingrained.

    Why this is correct

    Early internal audit involvement surfaces control design flaws while the system is still being specified, when remediation costs only documentation changes rather than code rework. This directly satisfies the SDLC's shift-left constraint: catching weaknesses before they become ingrained in production architecture, where retrofitting segregation of duties or audit trails becomes materially harder.

  • ✓

    Enhanced assurance that controls are embedded in the system design.

    Why this is correct

    Early audit participation gives independent assurance that required controls are actually designed into architecture, data flows and processing logic, rather than added later. This provides stakeholders with confidence that the system's control environment is complete.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CISA question from scratch — 934 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CISA practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISACA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CISA exam.