Courseiva
Implementing service monitoring strategiesmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

PCDOE Implementing service monitoring strategies Practice Question

An alerting policy for high CPU utilization on a VM is firing even when CPU is not high. The team suspects a misconfiguration. Which two possible issues should they check? (Choose two.)

⚠ Common exam trap

Google Cloud often tests the misconception that a low threshold (Option B) is the cause of false positives, but the real issue is the alignment period and aggregation settings that amplify transient spikes, not the threshold value itself.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The alert condition is using the average aggregation with a short alignment period.

Using a short alignment period with average aggregation can cause the alert to fire on brief spikes in CPU utilization that do not represent sustained high usage. If the alignment period is too short (e.g., 1 minute), the alerting policy may trigger on transient bursts, even when the overall CPU load is low. This is a common misconfiguration in Google Cloud Monitoring (formerly Stackdriver) where the alignment period and aggregator settings must match the expected workload pattern.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The alert condition is using the average aggregation with a short alignment period.

    Why this is correct

    A short alignment period makes the alert sensitive to brief spikes, causing false positives.

  • The threshold is set too low compared to actual CPU usage.

    Why it's wrong here

    A low threshold would cause alerts when CPU is genuinely high, not false positives.

  • The metric is being duplicated because multiple agents are running.

    Why this is correct

    Duplicate metrics can cause the aggregate CPU metric to exceed the threshold even if real usage is low.

  • The alerting policy was created in a different project and not imported.

    Why it's wrong here

    Policies are per project; cross-project imports are not automatic but do not cause false positives.

  • The VM is reporting metrics from a custom namespace instead of the standard agent.

    Why it's wrong here

    Custom namespace would not affect standard CPU alerts; it would be a different metric.

About these practice questions

This PCDOE question is part of Courseiva's 486-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PCDOE practice question is part of Courseiva's free Google Cloud certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PCDOE exam.