- A
The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list that references the same prefix-list as the route-map, but the flow monitor's action is to drop packets matching that prefix, causing the route to be withdrawn.
This is the root cause. The flow monitor's drop action on the matched prefix causes the route to be withdrawn, either by triggering routing protocol reactions or by interfering with the leak process.
- B
The route-map LEAK is also applied to the flow monitor as a filter, and the flow monitor's match statement is misconfigured to deny the route, preventing the route from being leaked.
Why wrong: Incorrect. A flow monitor does not use the route-map as a filter, and even if it did, it would not prevent route leaking. Route leaking is controlled by the route-map applied to the VRF, not by the flow monitor.
- C
The VRF A interface has a flow monitor applied that uses a flow record with the 'vrf' field, causing the router to ignore the route leaking configuration.
Why wrong: Incorrect. The presence of the 'vrf' field in a flow record does not cause the router to ignore route leaking. The flow record only affects how traffic is monitored, not routing table operations.
- D
The route leaking configuration requires a next-hop that is not reachable due to the flow monitor consuming bandwidth.
Why wrong: Incorrect. Bandwidth consumption from the flow monitor is not a realistic root cause for route disappearance. Route leaking does not depend on bandwidth, and even if the interface were congested, routes would not be withdrawn.
Flexible NetFlow Causing Route Leaking Failure in VRF
This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of netflow and flexible netflow. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A VRF-aware network uses route leaking between VRF A and VRF B. After configuring Flexible NetFlow to monitor traffic in VRF A, some routes that were previously leaked to VRF B disappear. Router R1 has: ip route vrf A 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0. route-map LEAK permit 10 match ip address prefix-list GLOBAL. The prefix-list GLOBAL permits 10.0.0.0/8. The flow monitor is applied to the VRF A interface. What is the root cause?
Quick Answer
The answer is that the route-map LEAK is also applied to the flow monitor as a filter, and the flow monitor’s match statement is misconfigured to deny the route, preventing the route from being leaked. This occurs because Flexible NetFlow can use a route-map as a traffic filter for the flow monitor, and if that same route-map is used for VRF route leaking, the router applies the match logic in both contexts. When the flow monitor’s match ip address prefix-list statement includes a deny for the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix, it blocks the route from being considered for the leak, even though the prefix-list permits it in the route-map. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this tests your understanding of how Flexible NetFlow interacts with VRF-aware features and the subtle conflict that arises when shared route-maps are used for both monitoring and route leaking. A common trap is assuming the flow monitor only collects statistics without affecting routing behavior. Memory tip: “A shared map can trap a leak—if the monitor denies, the leak will sleep.”
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list that references the same prefix-list as the route-map, but the flow monitor's action is to drop packets matching that prefix, causing the route to be withdrawn.
The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list statement referencing the same prefix-list used in the route-map LEAK. However, the flow monitor's action is set to drop packets matching that prefix. When the flow monitor is applied in the input direction on the VRF A interface, it evaluates packets before they are processed for routing. If the flow monitor matches a packet with the 10.0.0.0/8 destination, it drops the packet. This can cause the router to withdraw the route because the router may interpret the sustained packet drops for that prefix as an indication that the next hop is unreachable, or because the flow monitor's drop action interferes with the route-leaking process. Although Flexible NetFlow typically does not affect routing, a misconfigured flow monitor with a drop action can inadvertently influence route availability, leading to the disappearance of leaked routes.
Key principle: ACLs process entries top to bottom and stop at the first match. Entry order and interface direction matter as much as the permit or deny statement.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list that references the same prefix-list as the route-map, but the flow monitor's action is to drop packets matching that prefix, causing the route to be withdrawn.
Why this is correct
This is the root cause. The flow monitor's drop action on the matched prefix causes the route to be withdrawn, either by triggering routing protocol reactions or by interfering with the leak process.
Related concept
Standard ACLs match source addresses.
- ✗
The route-map LEAK is also applied to the flow monitor as a filter, and the flow monitor's match statement is misconfigured to deny the route, preventing the route from being leaked.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. A flow monitor does not use the route-map as a filter, and even if it did, it would not prevent route leaking. Route leaking is controlled by the route-map applied to the VRF, not by the flow monitor.
- ✗
The VRF A interface has a flow monitor applied that uses a flow record with the 'vrf' field, causing the router to ignore the route leaking configuration.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. The presence of the 'vrf' field in a flow record does not cause the router to ignore route leaking. The flow record only affects how traffic is monitored, not routing table operations.
- ✗
The route leaking configuration requires a next-hop that is not reachable due to the flow monitor consuming bandwidth.
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. Bandwidth consumption from the flow monitor is not a realistic root cause for route disappearance. Route leaking does not depend on bandwidth, and even if the interface were congested, routes would not be withdrawn.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: ACLs stop at the first match
ACLs are processed top to bottom. The first matching entry wins, and an implicit deny usually exists at the end.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
ACL questions test precision: source, destination, protocol, port and direction. A generally correct ACL can still fail if it is applied on the wrong interface or in the wrong direction.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Standard ACLs match source addresses.
- Extended ACLs can match source, destination, protocol and ports.
- The first matching ACL entry is used.
- There is usually an implicit deny at the end.
TExam Day Tips
- Check inbound versus outbound direction.
- Read the ACL from top to bottom.
- Look for a broader permit or deny above the intended line.
Key takeaway
ACLs process entries top to bottom and stop at the first match. Entry order and interface direction matter as much as the permit or deny statement.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security administrator must allow nursing staff to reach a patient records server while blocking access from the guest Wi-Fi VLAN. After applying an extended ACL, traffic is still blocked from nursing workstations. The ACL was applied outbound instead of inbound on the wrong interface. Questions like this test ACL direction and placement rules.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review ACL processing order, placement rules (standard near destination, extended near source), and inbound vs outbound direction. Study wildcard masks and implicit deny. Then practise related 300-410 ACL questions on filtering logic and placement.
- →
NetFlow and Flexible NetFlow — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
NetFlow and Flexible NetFlow practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All 300-410 questions
2,152 questions across all exam domains
- →
Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
300-410 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related 300-410 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Layer 3 Technologies practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Layer 3 Technologies.
EIGRP Troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to EIGRP Troubleshooting.
OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to OSPF Troubleshooting (v2/v3).
BGP Troubleshooting practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to BGP Troubleshooting.
Route Redistribution practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Redistribution.
Policy-Based Routing (PBR) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Policy-Based Routing (PBR).
VRF-Lite practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to VRF-Lite.
Route Maps and Route Filtering practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Maps and Route Filtering.
Administrative Distance practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Administrative Distance.
Route Summarization practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Route Summarization.
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD).
VPN Technologies practice questions
Practise 300-410 questions linked to VPN Technologies.
Practice this exam
Start a free 300-410 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this 300-410 question test?
NetFlow and Flexible NetFlow — This question tests NetFlow and Flexible NetFlow — Standard ACLs match source addresses..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list that references the same prefix-list as the route-map, but the flow monitor's action is to drop packets matching that prefix, causing the route to be withdrawn. — The flow monitor is configured with a match ip address prefix-list statement referencing the same prefix-list used in the route-map LEAK. However, the flow monitor's action is set to drop packets matching that prefix. When the flow monitor is applied in the input direction on the VRF A interface, it evaluates packets before they are processed for routing. If the flow monitor matches a packet with the 10.0.0.0/8 destination, it drops the packet. This can cause the router to withdraw the route because the router may interpret the sustained packet drops for that prefix as an indication that the next hop is unreachable, or because the flow monitor's drop action interferes with the route-leaking process. Although Flexible NetFlow typically does not affect routing, a misconfigured flow monitor with a drop action can inadvertently influence route availability, leading to the disappearance of leaked routes.
What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?
Review ACL processing order, placement rules (standard near destination, extended near source), and inbound vs outbound direction. Study wildcard masks and implicit deny. Then practise related 300-410 ACL questions on filtering logic and placement.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Standard ACLs match source addresses.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More 300-410 practice questions
- Drag and drop the steps to negotiate an IKEv2 IPsec site-to-site tunnel into the correct order, from first to last.
- Drag and drop the steps to troubleshoot an IPsec site-to-site VPN adjacency failure into the correct order, from first t…
- Drag and drop the steps to verify and validate the operational state of an IPsec site-to-site VPN into the correct order…
- Consider the following configuration snippet: ip cef ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.25…
- A router is configured with 'logging host 10.1.1.100' and 'logging trap informational'. The engineer notices that syslog…
- Drag and drop the steps to configure a GRE tunnel for IPv6 over IPv4 into the correct order, from first to last.
Last reviewed: Jun 19, 2026
This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.