A threat hunter wants to identify unauthorized DNS tunneling. Which data point is most indicative of this activity?
DNS tunnelling exfiltrates data by encoding it in DNS queries, commonly abusing TXT records because they carry larger payloads. A high volume of TXT queries to unusual domains therefore signals tunnelling far more strongly than ordinary A or PTR lookups.
Why this answer
DNS tunneling exfiltrates data or establishes C2 by encoding payloads in DNS query names and responses, most commonly using TXT records because they can carry arbitrary text up to 255 characters per string and are rarely queried in bulk during normal operations. A high volume of TXT record queries — especially to a single domain or with long, encoded subdomains — is a strong indicator of tunneling tools like iodine, dnscat2, or DNSExfiltrator.
Exam trap
312-85 often tests the assumption that any high DNS volume indicates tunneling — the trap is failing to recognize that TXT records, not A records, are the specific indicator because of their payload capacity and rarity in normal traffic.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because a low volume of DNS failures is normal baseline behavior and does not indicate tunneling; in fact, tunneling often produces successful responses, not failures. Option B is wrong because high volumes of A record queries are typical of normal web browsing and CDN resolution, making them a poor discriminator for malicious activity. Option C is wrong because SRV record updates are associated with service discovery (e.g., Active Directory, SIP) and are not a primary tunneling vector — SRV records are not designed to carry arbitrary payloads.