Which of the following is considered an 'Indicator of Attack' (IOA) rather than an IOC?
A command-line execution sequence captures attacker behaviour in progress, such as suspicious process chains, rather than a static artefact left behind. IOAs focus on active tactics and techniques, distinguishing them from IOCs like file hashes or IP addresses.
Why this answer
An Indicator of Attack (IOA) focuses on the behavior or intent of an attack in progress — such as a suspicious command-line execution sequence — rather than static artifacts. IOAs are behavioral and can detect novel attacks even when no known signature exists.
Exam trap
The trap is equating 'indicator' with 'artifact' — candidates pick a hash or IP because it sounds like an indicator, but IOAs are behavioral sequences, not static values.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because a malicious file hash is a static artifact (IOC) that only identifies known malware and is trivially changed by attackers. Option C is wrong because a specific registry key for persistence is a host-based artifact (IOC), not a behavioral pattern. Option D is wrong because a blacklisted IP address is a network artifact (IOC) that is easily rotated by adversaries.