During an assessment, a penetration tester captures an LLMNR/NBT-NS broadcast request on the local network segment. Which tool can the tester use to spoof the response and capture the resulting NTLMv2 password hash when the victim machine attempts authentication?
Responder poisons LLMNR, NBT-NS and mDNS queries, answering the broadcast so the victim authenticates to the attacker and surrenders its NTLMv2 hash. This directly satisfies the stem's requirement to spoof the response and capture credentials.
Why this answer
Responder is a tool specifically designed to poison LLMNR, NBT-NS, and mDNS queries, spoofing responses to capture NTLMv1/v2 hashes when victims attempt authentication. It listens for broadcast name resolution requests and responds as the requested host, tricking the victim into sending credentials. This makes it the correct tool for this scenario.
Exam trap
CPENT often tests the specific tool for LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning, and candidates may confuse Responder with general MITM tools like Ettercap or Cain & Abel, which do not have the same specialized functionality.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because Cain & Abel is an older password recovery tool that can perform ARP poisoning and capture credentials, but it is not specifically designed for LLMNR/NBT-NS spoofing and is less effective in modern Windows environments. Option B is wrong because Ettercap is a man-in-the-middle suite for switched networks that can perform ARP spoofing and protocol dissection, but it does not natively handle LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning without additional plugins. Option D is wrong because Wireshark is a passive packet analyzer; it can capture LLMNR traffic but cannot spoof responses or capture NTLMv2 hashes from authentication attempts.