Static Analysis Tools for Malware: IDA Pro and Ghidra
Which TWO tools are commonly used for static analysis of malware binaries?
Quick Answer
The correct answer is Ghidra and IDA Pro, as both are industry-standard static analysis tools for malware that allow forensic examiners to reverse engineer malicious binaries without executing them. IDA Pro disassembles machine code into assembly language, providing cross-references, function graphs, and decompilation to reveal embedded strings and control flow, while Ghidra offers similar capabilities with a free, open-source alternative. On the Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator CHFI exam, this question tests your understanding of static versus dynamic analysis—static tools examine code at rest, whereas dynamic tools like debuggers run the sample in a sandbox. A common trap is confusing IDA Pro with a dynamic analysis tool because it includes a debugger, but its primary use in malware analysis is static disassembly. Memory tip: think “Ghidra and IDA” as the “static duo” for reading code like a book, never executing it.
⚠ Common exam trap
EC-Council often tests the distinction between static and dynamic analysis tools, and the trap here is that candidates confuse tools that monitor live behavior (like Cuckoo Sandbox or Process Monitor) with those that analyze code without execution, leading them to select dynamic analysis tools for a static analysis question.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
IDA Pro
IDA Pro is a leading interactive disassembler and debugger used for static analysis of malware binaries. It allows analysts to examine executable code without executing it, by disassembling machine code into assembly language and providing cross-references, function graphs, and decompilation capabilities. This makes it essential for reverse engineering malicious software to understand its logic, embedded strings, and control flow.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Cuckoo Sandbox
Why it's wrong here
Cuckoo Sandbox is a dynamic analysis sandbox.
- ✗
Wireshark
Why it's wrong here
Wireshark is a network analysis tool.
- ✓
IDA Pro
Why this is correct
IDA Pro is a disassembler and debugger for static analysis.
- ✓
Ghidra
Why this is correct
Ghidra is an open-source reverse engineering tool for static analysis.
- ✗
Process Monitor
Why it's wrong here
Process Monitor is a dynamic analysis tool.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 745 original CHFI practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
2 more ways this is tested on CHFI
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A forensic analyst is performing static analysis of a Windows PE file. Which TWO of the following tools are specifically designed for static analysis of malware?
easy- A.Wireshark
- B.Cuckoo Sandbox
- ✓ C.IDA Pro
- ✓ D.Ghidra
- E.Process Monitor
Why C: IDA Pro (C) is a disassembler and debugger specifically built for reverse engineering binary executables, allowing an analyst to statically examine a PE file's code, imports, and structure without executing it. Ghidra (D) is the NSA's open-source software reverse engineering suite that likewise performs static disassembly and decompilation of PE files, making it a core static malware analysis tool. Both operate on the file on disk, matching the scenario's requirement for static analysis. Wireshark (A) is a network protocol analyzer that inspects captured traffic, not PE binaries. Cuckoo Sandbox (B) is a dynamic analysis platform that executes malware in an isolated VM and observes behavior, so it is not static. Process Monitor (E) is a live runtime monitoring tool for file, registry, and process activity, also dynamic rather than static.
Variation 2. Which of the following tools is BEST suited for performing static analysis of a malware binary to identify strings, headers, and imported functions without executing the file?
easy- A.Cuckoo Sandbox
- B.Any.run
- C.Process Monitor
- ✓ D.IDA Pro
Why D: IDA Pro is the correct choice because it is a disassembler and debugger specifically designed for static analysis of binary executables. It allows an analyst to examine strings, PE/ELF headers, and imported functions without executing the file, making it ideal for malware reverse engineering. In contrast, the other options require execution or focus on runtime behavior.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.