Question 139 of 1,000
Malware ForensicshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct choice is to acquire a memory dump and perform memory forensics with tools like Volatility. This approach is most effective because memory-resident malware operates entirely in RAM, leaving no traces on the hard drive for traditional antivirus or EDR solutions to scan. By capturing the volatile memory and analyzing artifacts such as running processes, network connections, and injected code, investigators can detect stealthy threats that never write to disk. On the CHFI exam, this scenario tests your understanding of live response and memory forensics as a critical countermeasure against fileless attacks. A common trap is to rely on disk-based analysis, which misses the malware entirely. Remember the mnemonic: “RAM reveals what disk denies” — always dump memory first when disk scans fail.

CHFI Malware Forensics Practice Question

This CHFI practice question tests your understanding of malware forensics. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An organization suspects a stealthy malware infection on a critical server. Traditional antivirus and EDR solutions have not detected anything. Which forensic approach would be most effective in identifying the malware, given that it likely resides only in memory?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Acquire a memory dump and perform memory forensics with tools like Volatility

Option B is correct because the malware resides only in memory, making it invisible to disk-based scans. Memory forensics with tools like Volatility allows investigators to analyze RAM artifacts (e.g., processes, network connections, injected code) to detect stealthy malware that never writes to disk.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Perform a full disk scan with updated antivirus signatures

    Why it's wrong here

    Fileless malware does not write to disk, so disk scans would not detect it.

  • Acquire a memory dump and perform memory forensics with tools like Volatility

    Why this is correct

    Memory forensics captures the malware's code and artifacts in RAM for analysis.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Conduct a live analysis using built-in Windows tools like Task Manager

    Why it's wrong here

    Live analysis may miss stealthy malware and could alter forensic evidence.

  • Analyze network traffic for anomalies using a NetFlow analyzer

    Why it's wrong here

    Network analysis may reveal C2 communications but not the malware code itself.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the misconception that live analysis tools (like Task Manager or Process Explorer) are sufficient for detecting memory-resident malware, but they fail to reveal hidden or injected code that only memory forensics can uncover.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Memory forensics with Volatility leverages the operating system's memory manager to reconstruct process lists, handle tables, and virtual address descriptors (VADs) from a raw memory dump. This allows detection of hidden processes (e.g., via DKOM), injected shellcode, and API hooks that evade live tools. In real-world scenarios, fileless malware like Kovter or Poweliks operates entirely in memory, and only a memory dump can capture its artifacts before reboot.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CHFI practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CHFI practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CHFI question test?

Malware Forensics — This question tests Malware Forensics — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Acquire a memory dump and perform memory forensics with tools like Volatility — Option B is correct because the malware resides only in memory, making it invisible to disk-based scans. Memory forensics with tools like Volatility allows investigators to analyze RAM artifacts (e.g., processes, network connections, injected code) to detect stealthy malware that never writes to disk.

What should I do if I get this CHFI question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.