Question 126 of 1,000
Application, Email and Cloud ForensicsmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct answer is path traversal and privilege escalation. This single IIS log entry reveals both attacks because the GET request uses `../` sequences to traverse directories outside the web root, targeting the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) file at `/../../windows/system32/config/sam`. The SAM database stores hashed Windows user credentials, and successfully accessing it would allow an attacker to extract password hashes for offline cracking, directly enabling privilege escalation to a higher-level account. On the CHFI exam, this question tests your ability to correlate a single log line with multiple attack indicators—a common scenario where one entry shows both the method (path traversal via directory climbing) and the objective (privilege escalation via credential theft). A frequent trap is focusing only on the 404 status code and dismissing the attempt, but remember: a failed request still indicates intent. Memory tip: “Two dots up, SAM down”—the `../` climbs directories, while the SAM file brings privileges down.

CHFI Application, Email and Cloud Forensics Practice Question

This CHFI practice question tests your understanding of application, email and cloud forensics. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security analyst notices repeated entries in an IIS log: 10.0.0.2, -, 05/Feb/2023:08:12:34 +0000, GET /../../windows/system32/config/sam, 404, 0, 532. Which TWO of the following attack types are indicated by this log entry?

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Directory traversal

The use of '../' indicates path traversal, and the target file (SAM) is a common target for privilege escalation.

Key principle: Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • SQL injection

    Why it's wrong here

    No SQL syntax is present; the request is a path traversal.

  • Directory traversal

    Why this is correct

    '../' sequences aim to traverse directories to access restricted files.

    Related concept

    Authentication checks who the user is.

  • Privilege escalation attempt

    Why this is correct

    Accessing the SAM file could lead to credential theft and privilege escalation.

    Related concept

    Authentication checks who the user is.

  • Denial of service

    Why it's wrong here

    The log shows a single request, not a flood.

  • Cross-site scripting

    Why it's wrong here

    No script injection is present.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    The log shows a single request, not a flood.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Key takeaway

Authentication proves identity; authorization controls what that identity can do after login. Both must work for full privileged access.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CHFI questions on access control and AAA configuration.

Related practice questions

Related CHFI practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CHFI practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CHFI question test?

Application, Email and Cloud Forensics — This question tests Application, Email and Cloud Forensics — Authentication checks who the user is..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Directory traversal — The use of '../' indicates path traversal, and the target file (SAM) is a common target for privilege escalation.

What should I do if I get this CHFI question wrong?

Review Cisco AAA concepts — authentication, authorization, and accounting. Study privilege levels (0–15), command authorization under TACACS+, and how RADIUS differs. Then practise related CHFI questions on access control and AAA configuration.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Authentication checks who the user is.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.