Courseiva
Computer Forensics Lab →hardMultiple Choice

CHFI Computer Forensics Lab Practice Question

A forensic lab receives a sealed evidence bag containing a laptop seized during an investigation. The chain-of-custody form shows the bag was sealed at the scene by an officer. Before beginning analysis, the examiner must document the evidence. Which action best preserves the chain of custody at this point?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is treating chain of custody as a formality that can be completed later, when in fact the receipt documentation is the critical link that proves the evidence was not altered.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Photograph the sealed bag and its seal number, then record the date, time, and examiner name before opening

Chain of custody requires documenting the evidence's condition at every transfer. Photographing the sealed bag, recording the seal number, and logging the date, time, and examiner name before opening establishes an unbroken record from seizure to analysis. Skipping, delaying, or re-sealing without documentation creates gaps that weaken admissibility.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Ask the officer who sealed the bag to re-seal it in the lab before analysis

    Why it's wrong here

    Re-sealing by the original officer in the lab does not document the bag's condition at receipt and could be seen as altering the evidence. It also creates confusion about who had control between seizure and lab receipt. The correct practice is to document, not re-seal, unless a documented transfer requires it.

  • ✗

    Immediately open the bag and begin imaging to save time

    Why it's wrong here

    Opening the bag without documenting the seal number and condition breaks the chain of custody because there is no record of the bag's state at receipt. If the seal was already compromised, that fact would go unnoticed. This shortcut undermines the admissibility of any evidence derived from the laptop.

  • ✗

    Store the bag in the evidence locker and delay documentation until analysis begins

    Why it's wrong here

    Delaying documentation leaves a gap in the chain of custody between receipt and the start of analysis. If the bag were accessed or damaged during storage, there would be no baseline record to compare against. Documentation must occur at the moment of receipt, not later.

  • ✓

    Photograph the sealed bag and its seal number, then record the date, time, and examiner name before opening

    Why this is correct

    Photographing the sealed bag and recording the seal number, date, time, and examiner name creates an auditable record of the bag's condition at receipt. This documentation links the seal applied at the scene to the examiner who opens it, preserving continuity. It is the expected first step before any analysis and supports later testimony about evidence integrity.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CHFI question from scratch — 745 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official EC-Council exam blueprint

This CHFI practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CHFI exam.