Courseiva
Enumeration and System HackinghardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CEH Enumeration and System Hacking Practice Question

Which THREE of the following are methods for covering tracks after compromising a system? (Select 3)

⚠ Common exam trap

EC-CEH often tests the distinction between actions taken during the attack (privilege escalation, disabling AV) and actions taken after the attack to erase evidence (clearing logs, hiding files with rootkits, steganography), so candidates mistakenly select privilege escalation or AV disabling as track-covering methods.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Installing a rootkit to hide files and processes

Installing a rootkit is a classic method for covering tracks because it operates at the kernel or user level to intercept system calls (e.g., NtQuerySystemInformation on Windows) and hide malicious files, processes, registry keys, and network connections from standard enumeration tools like Task Manager or netstat. This prevents the victim from detecting the compromise during routine monitoring.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Installing a rootkit to hide files and processes

    Why this is correct

    Installing a rootkit is a sophisticated method for covering tracks, as a rootkit is a collection of tools designed to obtain and maintain privileged access to a computer while actively hiding its presence. By modifying core operating system components, rootkits can conceal malicious files, running processes, network connections, and even user accounts from standard system utilities and security software. This makes it extremely difficult for forensic investigators to detect the attacker's activities and persistence mechanisms, effectively covering their tracks post-compromise.

  • Escalating privileges to SYSTEM

    Why it's wrong here

    Escalating privileges to SYSTEM is a crucial phase in the attack lifecycle, allowing an attacker to gain full control over the compromised machine. This action is performed to achieve deeper access and execute further malicious activities, such as installing persistent backdoors or accessing sensitive data. However, it is an enabling step for the attack itself, not a method employed to conceal the attacker's presence or activities after the objective has been achieved.

  • Disabling antivirus software

    Why it's wrong here

    Disabling antivirus software is primarily an evasion technique used *during* the initial stages of an attack or when deploying malware to prevent detection and execution blocking. While it helps the attack succeed, it does not actively remove or obscure forensic evidence of the attacker's presence or actions *after* the compromise. Covering tracks involves cleaning up artifacts, not merely bypassing security controls to facilitate the initial intrusion or payload delivery.

  • Using steganography to hide stolen data in images

    Why this is correct

    Using steganography involves embedding secret information, such as exfiltrated data, within an ordinary, non-secret file or message, like an image or audio file. This technique allows attackers to covertly transfer stolen data out of a network without raising suspicion, as the carrier file appears innocuous. By making the data itself invisible within legitimate traffic, steganography effectively covers the tracks of data exfiltration, making it challenging to detect the compromise.

  • Clearing event logs

    Why this is correct

    Clearing event logs, such as Windows Security, System, and Application logs, is a fundamental and direct method for covering an attacker's tracks. These logs record critical system activities, including login attempts, process executions, and security events, which are invaluable for forensic analysis. By systematically deleting or tampering with these records, an attacker attempts to erase evidence of their presence, actions, and the timeline of the compromise, hindering detection and incident response efforts.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CEH question from scratch — 870 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.