Question 204 of 1,010
Footprinting, Reconnaissance and ScanningeasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is analyzing TTL and window size from captured packets, as this passive OS fingerprinting technique does not send any packets to the target. This method works by inspecting the Time-to-Live (TTL) and TCP window size values in intercepted traffic, which are operating system-specific defaults—for instance, Linux typically uses a TTL of 64 and a window size of 5840, while Windows uses TTL 128 and window size 65535. Since no packets are ever transmitted to the target, the technique remains entirely passive and undetectable, a key distinction from active fingerprinting. On the Certified Ethical Hacker CEH exam, this concept tests your understanding of reconnaissance methods that avoid alerting the target; a common trap is confusing passive techniques with active ones like sending crafted probes. Remember the memory tip: “No packets, no problem—just watch the TTL and window to tell the OS tale.”

CEH Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning Practice Question

This CEH practice question tests your understanding of footprinting, reconnaissance and scanning. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which of the following is a passive OS fingerprinting technique that does NOT send any packets to the target?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "NOT"

    Why it matters: Negative qualifier — you are looking for the one option that does NOT apply. Most options will be true; only one is false for this scenario.

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Analyzing TTL and window size from captured packets

Passive OS fingerprinting involves observing network traffic without sending any packets to the target. Analyzing the Time-to-Live (TTL) and TCP window size from captured packets is a classic passive technique because these values are OS-specific defaults (e.g., Linux often uses TTL 64 and window size 5840, while Windows uses TTL 128 and window size 65535). Since no packets are sent to the target, this method is entirely passive and undetectable.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Sending TCP SYN packets and analyzing responses

    Why it's wrong here

    Sending packets is active fingerprinting.

  • Analyzing TTL and window size from captured packets

    Why this is correct

    This is passive fingerprinting; it uses existing traffic.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "NOT" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Performing a NULL scan

    Why it's wrong here

    NULL scan sends packets with no flags, which is active.

  • Using Nmap -O flag

    Why it's wrong here

    -O sends probes and analyzes responses, making it active.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse passive fingerprinting with active techniques like banner grabbing or Nmap scans, assuming that any packet capture analysis is passive, but the key distinction is whether any packets are sent to the target.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Passive fingerprinting relies on observing subtle differences in how operating systems implement the TCP/IP stack. For example, the initial TTL value is set by the OS and decremented by each hop, but the initial value can be inferred if the hop count is known. The TCP window size is also OS-specific; Windows typically uses a multiple of 65535, while Linux uses 5840 or 29200 depending on the kernel version. Tools like p0f specialize in passive fingerprinting by analyzing these fields from captured packets without any interaction with the target.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CEH exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CEH practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning.

Enumeration and System Hacking practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Enumeration and System Hacking.

Malware, Social Engineering and Network Attacks practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Malware, Social Engineering and Network Attacks.

Web Application and Injection Attacks practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Web Application and Injection Attacks.

Introduction to Ethical Hacking practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Introduction to Ethical Hacking.

Scanning Networks and Enumeration practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Scanning Networks and Enumeration.

Vulnerability Analysis and System Hacking practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Vulnerability Analysis and System Hacking.

Advanced Topics: Wireless, Cloud, IoT, Cryptography practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Advanced Topics: Wireless, Cloud, IoT, Cryptography.

Footprinting and Reconnaissance practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Footprinting and Reconnaissance.

Network and Web Application Attacks practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Network and Web Application Attacks.

Wireless, IoT and Cloud Security practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Wireless, IoT and Cloud Security.

Cryptography and Malware Analysis practice questions

Practise CEH questions linked to Cryptography and Malware Analysis.

Practice this exam

Start a free CEH practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CEH question test?

Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning — This question tests Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Analyzing TTL and window size from captured packets — Passive OS fingerprinting involves observing network traffic without sending any packets to the target. Analyzing the Time-to-Live (TTL) and TCP window size from captured packets is a classic passive technique because these values are OS-specific defaults (e.g., Linux often uses TTL 64 and window size 5840, while Windows uses TTL 128 and window size 65535). Since no packets are sent to the target, this method is entirely passive and undetectable.

What should I do if I get this CEH question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "NOT". Negative qualifier — you are looking for the one option that does NOT apply. Most options will be true; only one is false for this scenario.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on CEH

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. During a penetration test, the tester needs to identify the operating system of a remote host without sending any packets to it. Which technique should the tester use?

medium
  • A.Banner grabbing with Telnet
  • B.Passive OS fingerprinting using captured packets
  • C.Querying Shodan for the target IP
  • D.Active OS fingerprinting with Nmap -O

Why B: Passive OS fingerprinting (Option B) is correct because it analyzes captured network traffic—such as TCP/IP packet headers, TTL values, window sizes, and DF flags—to infer the remote host's operating system without sending any packets. This technique relies on subtle differences in how various OS stacks implement RFC 793, making it ideal for stealthy reconnaissance where no direct contact with the target is permitted.

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.