Courseiva
Web Application and Injection AttacksmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CEH Web Application and Injection Attacks Practice Question

A security analyst observes that a web application's login page responds with different HTTP status codes and response times for valid versus invalid usernames. This information leakage could be used to perform which type of authentication attack?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Username enumeration

Username enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a username exists, often through differing error messages or response times. This information can be leveraged for brute force or password spraying attacks by focusing on valid usernames.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Username enumeration

    Why this is correct

    Username enumeration is an attack where an attacker attempts to discover valid usernames by observing differences in application responses (e.g., distinct error messages, varying HTTP status codes, or even subtle timing discrepancies) when submitting valid versus invalid usernames. For instance, a "User not found" message for an invalid username compared to an "Incorrect password" message for a valid one clearly indicates a username's existence, allowing an attacker to compile a list of active accounts. This technique is a critical precursor to many other credential-based attacks.

  • Credential stuffing

    Why it's wrong here

    Credential stuffing involves taking large lists of username/password pairs obtained from data breaches on other websites and attempting to log in with them on a target application. This attack relies on users reusing credentials across multiple services. While a list of valid usernames can be helpful, it's not a prerequisite because the attack typically uses *known* leaked pairs, and the goal is direct login attempts, not the discovery of valid usernames through differing application responses.

  • Password spraying

    Why it's wrong here

    Password spraying is an attack where an attacker tries a small number of very common passwords (e.g., "Password123", "Summer2024!") against a large list of usernames, often across an entire domain. The primary goal is to avoid account lockouts by distributing attempts across many accounts rather than repeatedly failing on one. While a list of enumerated usernames can make this attack more efficient, the core technique itself does not *involve* the process of observing differing responses to *discover* usernames.

  • Brute force attack

    Why it's wrong here

    A brute force attack systematically tries every possible password combination for a specific target username until the correct one is found. This method is computationally intensive and often leads to account lockouts if not carefully managed. While knowing a valid username (potentially through enumeration) is necessary, the attack itself is defined by the exhaustive guessing of passwords for that single user, not by the observation of differing application responses to identify valid usernames.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every CEH question from scratch — 870 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.