Courseiva
Question 1,098 of 1,013
Security ArchitecturemediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SY0-701 Security Architecture Practice Question

Exhibit

Exhibit:
Device group: Sales-Laptops
Baseline check:
- Approved browser: installed
- Approved EDR: installed
- Unapproved remote admin tool: detected on 14 endpoints
- Local administrator rights: granted to all users in group
- Patch compliance: 68%

Management wants to prevent unauthorized software from running and keep future builds consistent.

Based on the exhibit, which action best addresses both the unsanctioned software problem and the need for consistent endpoint configuration?

Exhibit: Device group: Sales-Laptops Baseline check: - Approved browser: installed - Approved EDR: installed - Unapproved remote admin tool: detected on 14 endpoints - Local administrator rights: granted to all users in group - Patch compliance: 68%

Management wants to prevent unauthorized software from running and keep future builds consistent.

⚠ Common exam trap

Many candidates think removing admin rights alone is sufficient, but without application allowlisting, users can still run unapproved software from writable directories like AppData or Temp, so both controls are needed together.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Deploy application allowlisting through centralized endpoint management and remove local administrator rights.

Application allowlisting (via AppLocker or Windows Defender Application Control) centrally enforces which software can run, directly addressing the unsanctioned remote admin tool. Removing local administrator rights prevents users from bypassing the allowlist or making unauthorized configuration changes, ensuring consistent endpoint builds and improving patch compliance by limiting user-driven modifications.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Deploy application allowlisting through centralized endpoint management and remove local administrator rights.

    Why this is correct

    Application allowlisting is the best fit because it prevents unapproved tools from executing even if they are present on a device. Removing local administrator rights also reduces the chance that users can install or alter software outside the baseline. Combined, these controls support consistent endpoint hardening and make it much harder for risky utilities to appear across the fleet.

  • Keep users as local admins but require stronger email passwords for better overall security.

    Why it's wrong here

    While stronger email passwords reduce the risk of credential theft and account compromise, they have no effect on the local privilege level of an endpoint user. A user with administrative rights can install drivers, create services, disable security features, or add unauthorized applications—actions that password policies do not govern. Local admin rights are an identity/access risk that is orthogonal to authentication strength; even the most robust password cannot stop a user from deliberately or accidentally installing an application from an untrusted source.

  • Disable the EDR agent during software installs to avoid false alerts from approved apps.

    Why it's wrong here

    Disabling the EDR agent during software installation opens a window of blindness where malware that is bundled with an installer, or that exploits a vulnerability in the installer, can execute without detection. EDR telemetry is essential for catching suspicious behaviors like persistence, injection, or outbound callbacks, and the moment of installation is exactly when such behaviors are most likely to occur. Legitimate false positives should be handled through allowlisting rules, application metadata, or suppression policies, not by deactivating the sensor and sacrificing endpoint visibility for a temporary convenience.

  • Store approved installers on a shared drive and let users choose what to install.

    Why it's wrong here

    Providing a shared network drive for approved installers is a distribution convenience, not a security enforcement mechanism. Users can still run unapproved executables from removable media, email attachments, or web downloads, and the shared drive itself often remains writable to standard users, enabling tampering or the placement of malicious files. Without application allowlisting or least-privilege restrictions, the endpoint is still vulnerable to any software that a user chooses to install, so this measure alone does not address the baseline drift described in the exhibit.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.