Question 1,141 of 1,152
Security OperationsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is the Eradication phase. This is correct because the team has moved beyond simply containing the threat and is now actively removing malicious artifacts like the cron job while patching the vulnerable package to eliminate the root cause. Confirming no persistence remains is the final verification step within Eradication, ensuring the environment is clean before transitioning to Recovery. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this phase tests your ability to distinguish between active removal of threats (Eradication) and the initial stopping of damage (Containment). A common trap is confusing the removal of a specific artifact with the patching of the underlying vulnerability—both must occur for Eradication to be complete. Remember the mnemonic: "Eradicate the evil, then patch the path."

SY0-701 Security Operations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A Linux web server was compromised through an outdated package. The team isolated the host, captured evidence, removed a malicious cron job, patched the vulnerable package, and confirmed no persistence remains. Which incident response phase are they primarily in now?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Eradication, because malicious artifacts and the underlying weakness are being removed.

The team has already identified the compromise, isolated the host, and removed the malicious cron job. Patching the vulnerable package addresses the root cause, which is the core of the Eradication phase. Confirming no persistence remains verifies that the eradication was successful, making this the current phase.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Identification, because the team is still confirming that the event happened.

    Why it's wrong here

    Identification happens when the incident is first detected and validated, which has already occurred in this scenario.

  • Containment, because the host was isolated from the network.

    Why it's wrong here

    Containment was an earlier step; the team has moved beyond isolation into remediation and cleanup.

  • Eradication, because malicious artifacts and the underlying weakness are being removed.

    Why this is correct

    Eradication focuses on removing malware, persistence, and the cause of compromise so the attacker cannot easily return.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Lessons learned, because the server has already been secured.

    Why it's wrong here

    Lessons learned comes after recovery and closure, when the team reviews what happened and improves the process.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the isolation step (Containment) with the overall phase, but the question emphasizes the removal of the malicious cron job and patching, which are definitive Eradication actions.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    Identification happens when the incident is first detected and validated, which has already occurred in this scenario.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In incident response frameworks like NIST SP 800-61, Eradication involves removing malware, disabling breached accounts, and patching vulnerabilities. The cron job removal and package update directly address the attack vector, while the persistence check ensures no backdoors (e.g., SSH keys, reverse shells) remain. This phase often requires verifying system integrity with tools like `rkhunter` or `chkrootkit` before moving to Recovery.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security team runs a vulnerability scan on a web application and discovers an unpatched SQL injection flaw. The team prioritises remediation by CVSS score — critical flaws are patched within 24 hours, high within 7 days. Questions like this test whether you understand vulnerability management processes, scanning tools, and remediation prioritisation.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Eradication, because malicious artifacts and the underlying weakness are being removed. — The team has already identified the compromise, isolated the host, and removed the malicious cron job. Patching the vulnerable package addresses the root cause, which is the core of the Eradication phase. Confirming no persistence remains verifies that the eradication was successful, making this the current phase.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.