hardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped
XK0-006 Execute permission Practice Question
A system administrator is troubleshooting why a user cannot execute a script in their home directory. Which TWO conditions could prevent execution? (Choose two.)
⚠ Common exam trap
Common pitfalls include thinking that file ownership, umask, or the /etc/shells file prevent execution. In reality, the two key blockers are: absence of execute permission and the noexec mount option. Many candidates mistakenly believe that a shell must be listed in /etc/shells for script execution, but that file is only used for login shells.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The script does not have the execute permission set for the user
For a user to execute a script, the file must have the execute permission bit set for that user (or for the group or others, depending on the user's relationship to the file). Without the execute permission (e.g., `chmod +x`), the shell will refuse to run the script directly, returning a 'Permission denied' error. Option D is correct because if the filesystem is mounted with the noexec option, no files on that filesystem can be executed, regardless of permissions. Option E is incorrect because /etc/shells is only used to validate login shells; it does not affect script execution. The interpreter for a script is determined by the shebang line, and the system will attempt to run it regardless of whether it's listed in /etc/shells. Options A and B are incorrect: file ownership does not directly prevent execution as long as the user has appropriate permissions, and umask only affects default permissions of newly created files, not existing ones.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The script is owned by a different user
Why it's wrong here
Ownership alone does not prevent execution; the user may still have execute permission via group or other.
- ✗
The user's umask is set to 022
Why it's wrong here
Umask affects default permissions of newly created files, not execution of existing files.
- ✓
The script does not have the execute permission set for the user
Why this is correct
Without execute permission, the script cannot be run.
- ✓
The filesystem containing the script is mounted with the noexec option
Why this is correct
The noexec mount option prevents execution of any binary or script on that filesystem.
- ✗
The script is interpreted by a shell that is not listed in /etc/shells
Why it's wrong here
Incorrect. The /etc/shells file lists valid login shells but is not checked when executing a script; the script's interpreter is determined by the shebang line, and the system will attempt to run it regardless.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Navigating the Filesystem
Key term
umask
Umask (user file-creation mode mask) is a Linux/Unix setting that determines the default permissions assigned to new files and directories by subtracting or masking permission bits from a base set.
Key term
User
A user is any person, system, or device that interacts with an IT service, resource, or identity system, typically authenticated through credentials and authorized to perform specific actions.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every XK0-006 question from scratch — 979 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This XK0-006 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the XK0-006 exam.