Courseiva
Security →hardMultiple Choice

XK0-006 Security Practice Question

A system administrator configures PAM to enforce account lockout after 3 failed login attempts. Which PAM module should be used?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often confuse pam_faillock with pam_tally2 (a legacy module) or assume pam_unix alone can enforce lockout, but pam_unix lacks built-in lockout tracking and requires pam_faillock or pam_tally2 for that feature.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

pam_faillock

pam_faillock is the correct PAM module for enforcing account lockout after a specified number of failed login attempts. It tracks failed authentication attempts per user and can lock the account when the threshold (e.g., 3 attempts) is reached, typically by writing to a tally file like /var/log/faillock.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    pam_faillock

    Why this is correct

    pam_faillock tracks failed authentication attempts per account and locks the account once the configured threshold is reached, satisfying the three-attempt lockout constraint. Unlike pam_tally2, which is deprecated, pam_faillock integrates with the auth and account stacks and supports per-user unlock intervals, making it the current standard module for this enforcement.

  • ✗

    pam_pwquality

    Why it's wrong here

    pam_pwquality enforces password strength and complexity rules; it does not count failed authentication attempts or lock accounts. It is tempting because it is a standard PAM module controlling authentication policy, which suits password composition requirements, but lockout after failed logins requires pam_faillock or pam_tally2.

  • ✗

    pam_securetty

    Why it's wrong here

    pam_securetty restricts root logins to listed TTYs, so it never counts failed attempts or triggers lockout. It is tempting because it is a security-hardening PAM module, but its purpose is constraining where root may authenticate, not enforcing a failure threshold.

  • ✗

    pam_unix

    Why it's wrong here

    pam_unix handles password verification and account expiry, not failed-attempt counting; lockout requires pam_faillock or pam_tally2, which track failures per account. It is tempting because pam_unix is the module that actually authenticates users, so administrators assume it also manages lockout thresholds.

About these practice questions

This XK0-006 question is part of Courseiva's 781-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This XK0-006 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the XK0-006 exam.