Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

XK0-006 A database server is running slow Practice Question

A database server is running slow. The administrator uses iostat and notices high await times on the disk. Which of the following best explains the implication of high await?

⚠ Common exam trap

Test-takers frequently confuse 'await' with CPU wait time (iowait) or assume it directly indicates disk fullness, when in fact await is a pure I/O completion latency metric that can be high due to queueing, slow media, or controller issues.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Disk I/O requests are taking a long time to complete.

In iostat, 'await' measures the average time (in milliseconds) for I/O requests to be served by the disk, including time spent in the queue and the actual service time. A high await value indicates that disk I/O requests are taking a long time to complete, which directly explains the database server's slowness due to disk latency.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    The CPU is waiting too long for memory access.

    Why it's wrong here

    Await is an I/O metric reported per block device by iostat, quantifying time from request submission to completion; memory-access stalls appear as CPU cache-miss or stall counters, not disk await. CPU-memory contention is tempting because it also slows database queries, but it would be diagnosed with perf or vmstat, not iostat's device columns.

  • ✓

    Disk I/O requests are taking a long time to complete.

    Why this is correct

    await measures the average time in milliseconds for I/O requests issued to the device to be served, including queue wait. High values therefore indicate requests are completing slowly, pointing to disk saturation or latency rather than throughput or capacity problems.

  • ✗

    The disk is almost full, causing fragmentation.

    Why it's wrong here

    Await reflects request service and queue time, not capacity; a nearly full disk causes write failures or fragmentation-related seeks, which would surface as elevated %util or throughput changes rather than await alone. Capacity exhaustion is tempting because full filesystems do degrade databases, but the metric here is latency, so free-space checks are a separate diagnostic step.

  • ✗

    The network filesystem is experiencing latency.

    Why it's wrong here

    High await measures the average time for I/O requests issued to a block device to complete, including queue wait; iostat reports per-device statistics and does not measure NFS round-trip latency, which requires nfsstat or mountstats. Network filesystem latency is tempting because remote storage also produces slow I/O, but that diagnosis needs network-layer tooling, not local disk await.

About these practice questions

One of 781 original XK0-006 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This XK0-006 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the XK0-006 exam.