Courseiva
Data Governance →easyMultiple Select

DA0-002 Data Governance Practice Question

A data analyst is preparing a presentation to share findings with non-technical stakeholders. Which TWO practices should the analyst follow to effectively communicate data insights? (Choose two.)

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap is selecting options that seem thorough (raw data, all outliers) or impressive (technical jargon) when they actually hinder communication; the exam tests understanding that audience-centric, action-oriented communication is key.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Tailor the message to the audience

Option A, 'Tailor the message to the audience,' is correct because effective data communication requires framing findings in terms and context that non-technical stakeholders can readily understand, such as using plain language, relevant business metrics, and analogies instead of assuming technical background. Option E, 'Focus on actionable insights,' is correct because the primary purpose of presenting to stakeholders is to drive decisions, so the analyst should emphasize what the data means and what actions should follow rather than merely describing the data. Option B, 'Provide raw data tables,' is not appropriate because dumping unprocessed tables overwhelms non-technical audiences and obscures the key takeaways. Option C, 'Use technical jargon to demonstrate expertise,' is wrong because jargon creates barriers and alienates the audience rather than clarifying insights. Option D, 'Include all data anomalies and outliers,' is not suitable because exhaustive detail distracts from the main message; anomalies should only be mentioned if they materially affect the conclusions.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Tailor the message to the audience

    Why this is correct

    Tailoring the message to the audience satisfies the stem's non-technical stakeholder constraint by translating statistical findings into business-relevant language, avoiding jargon and technical notation. This ensures comprehension and drives decision-making, since the audience lacks the analytical background assumed in specialist reporting.

  • ✗

    Provide raw data tables

    Why it's wrong here

    Raw data tables force stakeholders to interpret unaggregated values themselves, so the insight is never communicated. It is tempting because tables offer complete transparency, and raw data would be the correct choice for an appendix or a technical review where analysts verify calculations rather than consume conclusions.

  • ✗

    Use technical jargon to demonstrate expertise

    Why it's wrong here

    Technical jargon obscures meaning for non-technical stakeholders, defeating the purpose of translating findings into plain language. It is tempting because precise terminology signals analytical rigour, and jargon would be the correct choice when presenting to specialist peers who share the same vocabulary and need exact definitions.

  • ✗

    Include all data anomalies and outliers

    Why it's wrong here

    Including every anomaly and outlier buries the headline finding in noise that non-technical audiences cannot contextualise. It is tempting because outliers can reveal data-quality problems, and full anomaly disclosure would be the correct choice for a data-validation or audit audience assessing completeness.

  • ✓

    Focus on actionable insights

    Why this is correct

    Focusing on actionable insights translates raw findings into decisions non-technical stakeholders can act on, satisfying the stem's requirement to communicate effectively to a non-technical audience. Rather than presenting statistical detail or methodology, the analyst frames conclusions around recommended next steps, which is what this audience needs to make informed business choices.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every DA0-002 question from scratch — 1,004 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official CompTIA exam blueprint

This DA0-002 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DA0-002 exam.