Courseiva
Data Governance →easyMultiple Select

DA0-002 Data Governance Practice Question

A data analyst discovers an anomaly in a dataset. Which two actions should be taken before reporting? (Choose TWO.)

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to confuse 'immediate reporting' with proactive communication, but CompTIA Data+ expects the understanding that data validation must precede any stakeholder notification to maintain data credibility.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Verify the data source and extraction process

Option C is correct because verifying the data source and extraction process ensures the anomaly is not an artifact of how the data was pulled, transformed, or joined before it is escalated. Option D is correct because checking for data entry errors or technical glitches (e.g., sensor faults, ETL failures, or duplicate records) confirms whether the anomaly reflects a genuine signal or a data quality issue. Both steps establish validity and reproducibility of the finding, which is essential prior to reporting. Option A is wrong because assuming the anomaly is real without validation risks reporting a false positive. Option B is wrong because alerting all stakeholders immediately is premature before the anomaly is verified. Option E is wrong because removing the anomaly without documentation destroys evidence and violates data integrity and auditability practices.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Assume the anomaly is real and report it

    Why it's wrong here

    Treating an anomaly as genuine without verification risks publishing fabricated findings built on corrupt or duplicated records. It is tempting because anomalies sometimes reveal real events, and reporting it would be correct once validated through source checks or stakeholder confirmation, but assumption bypasses the investigation the stem requires before reporting.

  • ✗

    Immediately alert all stakeholders

    Why it's wrong here

    Alerting all stakeholders before validating the anomaly risks spreading false alarms and erodes trust if the data proves correct. Notification is tempting because incident communication is a genuine duty, but it belongs after verification and impact assessment, not as a first investigative step.

  • ✓

    Verify the data source and extraction process

    Why this is correct

    Verifying the source and extraction process confirms the anomaly reflects real data rather than a pipeline fault, satisfying the need to validate findings before reporting. Checking lineage, transformation logic and load errors distinguishes genuine outliers from artefacts introduced during ETL, preventing false alarms reaching stakeholders.

  • ✓

    Check for data entry errors or technical glitches

    Why this is correct

    Checking for data entry errors or technical glitches directly addresses the anomaly's most likely origin before escalation, satisfying the stem's requirement to validate findings prior to reporting. Verifying whether the deviation stems from transcription mistakes, parsing faults, or pipeline failures distinguishes genuine insight from noise, preventing analysts from reporting spurious results.

  • ✗

    Remove the anomaly without documentation

    Why it's wrong here

    Deleting an anomaly silently destroys the audit trail and prevents reviewers from validating whether it reflects a data-entry error, fraud or a genuine event. It is tempting because it produces a clean dataset quickly, and it would be acceptable only after documented investigation and approval, but undocumented removal breaches analytical integrity and reproducibility.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every DA0-002 question from scratch — 1,004 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DA0-002 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DA0-002 exam.