Question 26 of 509
Analyzing and Modeling DatahardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct first action is to remove highly correlated predictor variables and apply regularization such as Ridge or Lasso regression. This discrepancy—an R-squared of 0.99 on training data versus only 0.55 on the test set—is a textbook symptom of overfitting, where the model has memorized noise and specific patterns in the training data rather than learning generalizable relationships. On the CompTIA Data+ DA0-001 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of model generalization and the bias-variance tradeoff; a common trap is to assume that adding more predictors always improves the model, when in fact too many features, especially correlated ones, inflate variance. Regularization techniques like Ridge (L2) and Lasso (L1) shrink coefficient magnitudes, directly penalizing complexity to improve out-of-sample performance. To remember this, think of the mnemonic “CRR” for Correlated features, Regularization, and Reduced overfitting—the three-step fix for a model that’s too complex.

DA0-001 Analyzing and Modeling Data Practice Question

This DA0-001 practice question tests your understanding of analyzing and modeling data. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A data analyst at a retail company is building a multiple linear regression model to forecast weekly sales. The dataset contains 50 predictor variables, including store size, promotional spend, holiday indicators, and many others. After training the model, the analyst observes an R-squared of 0.99 on the training set but only 0.55 on the holdout test set. Which action should the analyst take first to address this discrepancy?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Remove highly correlated predictor variables and apply regularization (e.g., Ridge or Lasso).

The high R-squared of 0.99 on training data versus 0.55 on test data is a classic sign of overfitting, where the model has learned noise and specific patterns in the training set that do not generalize. Removing highly correlated predictors reduces multicollinearity and model complexity, while regularization (Ridge or Lasso) penalizes large coefficients, shrinking them to prevent overfitting. This is the most direct first step to improve generalization.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Remove highly correlated predictor variables and apply regularization (e.g., Ridge or Lasso).

    Why this is correct

    Regularization and feature selection reduce overfitting by penalizing large coefficients and removing redundant predictors.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Add more predictor variables to increase the training R-squared further.

    Why it's wrong here

    Adding more predictors will likely worsen overfitting, not fix it.

  • Use k-fold cross-validation with a different random seed to get a more reliable test set estimate.

    Why it's wrong here

    Cross-validation changes evaluation but does not directly fix overfitting; the model itself needs adjustment.

  • Increase the number of hidden layers in the model to capture more complexity.

    Why it's wrong here

    Linear regression does not have hidden layers; this is irrelevant for a linear model.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may think a high R-squared is always good, or they may confuse overfitting with underfitting and choose to add more complexity (Option D) or more data (Option B), rather than recognizing the need to reduce model complexity and apply regularization.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Regularization techniques like Ridge (L2) add a penalty term λ∑β² to the loss function, shrinking coefficients toward zero but not eliminating them, which reduces variance at the cost of slight bias. Lasso (L1) adds λ∑|β|, which can drive some coefficients exactly to zero, performing automatic feature selection. In a dataset with 50 predictors, many may be redundant or noisy, and regularization helps the model focus on the most influential variables, improving out-of-sample performance.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related DA0-001 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DA0-001 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DA0-001 question test?

Analyzing and Modeling Data — This question tests Analyzing and Modeling Data — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Remove highly correlated predictor variables and apply regularization (e.g., Ridge or Lasso). — The high R-squared of 0.99 on training data versus 0.55 on test data is a classic sign of overfitting, where the model has learned noise and specific patterns in the training set that do not generalize. Removing highly correlated predictors reduces multicollinearity and model complexity, while regularization (Ridge or Lasso) penalizes large coefficients, shrinking them to prevent overfitting. This is the most direct first step to improve generalization.

What should I do if I get this DA0-001 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More DA0-001 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DA0-001 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DA0-001 exam.