Question 478 of 503
Security OperationshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

CS0-003 SOAR playbooks automate security workflows. Practice Question

This CS0-003 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. A key principle to apply: sOAR playbooks automate security workflows.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A SOC wants a SOAR playbook for suspected phishing that reduces analyst workload but avoids destructive action before confirmation. Which actions are appropriate for the first automated phase? In the evidence source phase, Which evidence source best supports or refutes the detection?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full Ansible explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Enrich URLs, detonate attachments in a sandbox, and collect mailbox search counts

Option D is correct because it aligns with the SOAR playbook's goal of reducing analyst workload through automated enrichment and triage without taking destructive action. Enriching URLs and detonating attachments in a sandbox provides threat intelligence, while collecting mailbox search counts helps quantify the incident's scope. This non-destructive evidence gathering allows analysts to make informed decisions before any containment or remediation steps.

Key principle: SOAR playbooks automate security workflows.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Close all similar alerts as duplicates

    Why it's wrong here

    Similarity does not prove benign status or complete containment.

  • Disable the reporting user's account immediately

    Why it's wrong here

    The reporter may not be compromised; disabling the account could be unnecessary.

  • Automatically delete all messages from the sender across all mailboxes

    Why it's wrong here

    Deletion can be appropriate after validation, but automatic destructive action is risky at the first phase.

  • Enrich URLs, detonate attachments in a sandbox, and collect mailbox search counts

    Why this is correct

    Early automation should gather context and evidence while keeping analysts in control of disruptive actions.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue words "best", "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    SOAR playbooks automate security workflows.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between 'investigative' and 'remediative' actions in SOAR playbooks, trapping candidates who confuse automated triage with automated containment or cleanup.

Trap categories for this question

  • Similar concept trap

    Similarity does not prove benign status or complete containment.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In a SOAR playbook, the first automated phase typically focuses on enrichment and triage using APIs to query threat intelligence platforms (e.g., VirusTotal, AlienVault OTX) and sandbox services (e.g., Joe Sandbox, Cuckoo). Mailbox search counts leverage Microsoft Graph API or EWS to identify how many users received the suspicious email, providing a scope metric. This phase avoids any write-back actions (e.g., delete, disable) to maintain a reversible state and preserve evidence for incident response.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • SOAR playbooks automate security workflows.
  • Initial SOAR automation focuses on evidence collection.
  • Sandbox detonation safely analyzes suspicious files.
  • URL enrichment queries threat intelligence for context.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

SOAR playbooks automate security workflows.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

An employee at a financial services firm receives an email that appears to come from the IT helpdesk, asking them to reset their password via a link. The link leads to a convincing fake portal that harvests credentials. Security teams use phishing simulations and security-awareness training to reduce this attack vector. Questions like this test whether you can identify social engineering techniques and appropriate controls.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review sOAR playbooks automate security workflows., then practise related CS0-003 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related CS0-003 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CS0-003 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CS0-003 question test?

Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — SOAR playbooks automate security workflows..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Enrich URLs, detonate attachments in a sandbox, and collect mailbox search counts — Option D is correct because it aligns with the SOAR playbook's goal of reducing analyst workload through automated enrichment and triage without taking destructive action. Enriching URLs and detonating attachments in a sandbox provides threat intelligence, while collecting mailbox search counts helps quantify the incident's scope. This non-destructive evidence gathering allows analysts to make informed decisions before any containment or remediation steps.

What should I do if I get this CS0-003 question wrong?

Review sOAR playbooks automate security workflows., then practise related CS0-003 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best", "first". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

SOAR playbooks automate security workflows.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CS0-003 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CS0-003 exam.