- A
Kerberoasting reconnaissance or ticket harvesting
Unusual TGS-REQ volume across service principals can indicate Kerberoasting activity.
- B
ARP spoofing
Why wrong: ARP spoofing is a Layer 2 attack and does not explain Kerberos ticket volume.
- C
DNS cache poisoning
Why wrong: DNS poisoning changes name resolution and is not characterized by SPN ticket requests.
- D
Pass-the-hash using NTLM only
Why wrong: This pattern concerns Kerberos service tickets, not NTLM hashes.
CS0-003 Security Operations Practice Question
This CS0-003 practice question tests your understanding of security operations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. A key principle to apply: kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A SIEM alert shows one workstation requesting a high number of Kerberos service tickets for many SPNs, followed by no corresponding service access. Which attack should be suspected? In the evidence source phase, Which evidence source best supports or refutes the detection?
Clue words in this question
Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.
Clue:
"best"Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Kerberoasting reconnaissance or ticket harvesting
The alert describes a workstation requesting a high number of Kerberos service tickets (TGS-REQ) for many different Service Principal Names (SPNs) without subsequently accessing those services. This pattern is classic for Kerberoasting reconnaissance, where an attacker with valid domain credentials (e.g., a compromised user account) enumerates SPNs to request TGS tickets for accounts that have servicePrincipalName attributes set. The attacker then extracts the encrypted ticket data offline to crack the associated service account passwords. The lack of corresponding service access confirms the tickets were harvested, not used for legitimate authentication.
Key principle: Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Kerberoasting reconnaissance or ticket harvesting
Why this is correct
Unusual TGS-REQ volume across service principals can indicate Kerberoasting activity.
Clue confirmation
The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.
Related concept
Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.
- ✗
ARP spoofing
Why it's wrong here
ARP spoofing is a Layer 2 attack and does not explain Kerberos ticket volume.
- ✗
DNS cache poisoning
Why it's wrong here
DNS poisoning changes name resolution and is not characterized by SPN ticket requests.
- ✗
Pass-the-hash using NTLM only
Why it's wrong here
This pattern concerns Kerberos service tickets, not NTLM hashes.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may confuse Kerberoasting with other credential-based attacks like pass-the-hash or golden ticket attacks, but the key differentiator is the high volume of TGS requests for multiple SPNs without actual service access, which is unique to Kerberoasting reconnaissance.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, Kerberoasting exploits the fact that TGS tickets are encrypted with the service account's NTLM hash. An attacker uses tools like Rubeus or Impacket's GetUserSPNs.py to query Active Directory for user accounts with SPNs (e.g., MSSQL, HTTP, CIFS) and then requests TGS tickets for those SPNs. The returned ticket includes an encrypted session key that can be cracked offline using hashcat or John the Ripper. A subtle behavior is that the Windows event log ID 4769 (A Kerberos service ticket was requested) will show multiple TGS requests from the same source IP to different SPNs, with the 'Ticket Options' field often set to 0x40810010 (forwardable, renewable, canonicalize) and no subsequent 4624 logon events for those services.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.
- Attackers request Kerberos TGS tickets for SPNs.
- Tickets are cracked offline to reveal service account passwords.
- High volume of TGS-REQs for many SPNs without access is a key indicator.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Review kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs., then practise related CS0-003 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.
- →
Security Operations — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Security Operations practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All CS0-003 questions
503 questions across all exam domains
- →
CompTIA CySA+ CS0-003 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
CS0-003 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related CS0-003 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security Operations practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to Security Operations.
Vulnerability Management practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to Vulnerability Management.
Incident Response and Management practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to Incident Response and Management.
Reporting and Communication practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to Reporting and Communication.
CompTIA A+ hardware practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ hardware.
CompTIA A+ mobile devices practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ mobile devices.
CompTIA A+ networking practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ networking.
CompTIA A+ operating systems practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ operating systems.
CompTIA A+ security practice questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ security.
CompTIA A+ software troubleshooting questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ software troubleshooting questions.
CompTIA A+ operational procedures questions
Practise CS0-003 questions linked to CompTIA A+ operational procedures questions.
Practice this exam
Start a free CS0-003 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this CS0-003 question test?
Security Operations — This question tests Security Operations — Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Kerberoasting reconnaissance or ticket harvesting — The alert describes a workstation requesting a high number of Kerberos service tickets (TGS-REQ) for many different Service Principal Names (SPNs) without subsequently accessing those services. This pattern is classic for Kerberoasting reconnaissance, where an attacker with valid domain credentials (e.g., a compromised user account) enumerates SPNs to request TGS tickets for accounts that have servicePrincipalName attributes set. The attacker then extracts the encrypted ticket data offline to crack the associated service account passwords. The lack of corresponding service access confirms the tickets were harvested, not used for legitimate authentication.
What should I do if I get this CS0-003 question wrong?
Review kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs., then practise related CS0-003 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.
Are there clue words in this question I should notice?
Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Kerberoasting targets service accounts with registered SPNs.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This CS0-003 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CS0-003 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.