Courseiva
Deployment →mediumMultiple Choice

CV0-004 Deployment Practice Question

A DevOps team is deploying a containerized application to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). The team wants to automate the deployment of the application along with its dependencies, such as ConfigMaps and Services, using a single package. Which tool should the team use?

⚠ Common exam trap

CV0-004 often tests the distinction between packaging/lifecycle tools (Helm) and customization tools (Kustomize) or raw kubectl, so candidates who pick Kustomize miss that it does not provide single-package install with versioned releases.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Helm charts

Helm is the de facto package manager for Kubernetes and bundles all related manifests — Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, Secrets, Ingress — into a single versioned chart that can be installed, upgraded, and rolled back with one command. This directly matches the requirement to deploy an application and its dependencies as a single package. Helm also supports templating and values files for environment-specific configuration.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Helm charts

    Why this is correct

    Helm charts package Kubernetes manifests into one versioned, parameterised release, bundling Deployments with ConfigMaps and Services so a single `helm install` deploys the application and its dependencies together. This directly satisfies the stem's requirement for one package automating GKE deployment of the app plus its dependencies.

  • ✗

    kubectl apply with multiple manifest files

    Why it's wrong here

    Applying separate manifests with kubectl is imperative and sequential, with no single packaged, versioned release or rollback. It is tempting because it deploys ConfigMaps and Services directly, and would be correct for ad hoc changes or simple one-off resources rather than repeatable packaged deployments.

  • ✗

    Kustomize overlays

    Why it's wrong here

    Kustomize overlays patch and customise existing manifests per environment; they do not bundle an application with its ConfigMaps and Services into one installable, versioned artefact. Kustomize is the right choice when the same base manifests must be varied across dev, staging and production without duplication.

  • ✗

    Docker Compose

    Why it's wrong here

    Docker Compose orchestrates multi-container applications on a single Docker host and cannot deploy to a GKE cluster. It is tempting because it does package services and configuration into one YAML file, and would be correct for local development or a single-server deployment outside Kubernetes.

About these practice questions

This CV0-004 question is part of Courseiva's 834-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official CompTIA exam blueprint

This CV0-004 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CV0-004 exam.