Courseiva
Security Operations →mediumMultiple Choice

CAS-004 Security Operations Practice Question

During an incident response, the team identifies that an attacker gained initial access via a phishing email containing a malicious macro. The macro downloaded a payload from a remote server. Which phase of the incident response lifecycle is currently being executed when the team identifies the phishing email as the attack vector?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap is assuming that identifying the attack vector is part of containment or eradication — but vector identification is squarely in Detection and Analysis, before any containment actions begin.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Detection and analysis

Detection and analysis is the phase where the IR team identifies and validates the incident, determines its scope, and identifies the attack vector (e.g., phishing email with malicious macro). Identifying the phishing email as the initial access vector is a classic detection-and-analysis activity, occurring before containment or eradication.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Containment, eradication, and recovery

    Why it's wrong here

    Containment, eradication and recovery addresses limiting spread, removing the payload and restoring systems; identifying the phishing email as the vector is detection and analysis. It is tempting because the malicious macro demands containment, but the team is still determining how access was gained, not yet containing it.

  • ✗

    Preparation

    Why it's wrong here

    Preparation covers building tools, playbooks and training before an incident; identifying the phishing vector occurs during detection and analysis, after the event. Preparation is tempting because phishing awareness training happens there, but the stem describes active investigation of a live incident, not pre-incident readiness.

  • ✗

    Lessons learned

    Why it's wrong here

    Lessons learned happens after containment and eradication, reviewing what occurred to improve future response; identifying the attack vector is detection and analysis. It is tempting because the phishing email will eventually feed a lessons-learned review, but that phase follows recovery, not initial vector identification.

  • ✓

    Detection and analysis

    Why this is correct

    Identifying the phishing email as the initial access vector is analysis of collected evidence to determine how the intrusion occurred, which falls within detection and analysis. This phase scopes the incident and informs later containment and eradication decisions.

About these practice questions

This CAS-005 question is part of Courseiva's 973-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official CompTIA exam blueprint

This CAS-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAS-005 exam.