Courseiva

CAS-004 Governance, Risk, and Compliance Practice Question

A healthcare organization is implementing a new telehealth platform that stores electronic protected health information (ePHI). The security team must ensure compliance with the HIPAA Security Rule. Which of the following is a required implementation specification for access control under the HIPAA Security Rule?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is assuming that all implementation specifications under the HIPAA Security Rule are mandatory, when some are addressable and allow flexibility.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Unique user identification

The HIPAA Security Rule distinguishes between required and addressable implementation specifications. Unique user identification is explicitly required for access control, ensuring accountability and traceability. Addressable specifications like emergency access, automatic logoff, and encryption require a risk-based decision but are not mandatory in all cases.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Emergency access procedure

    Why it's wrong here

    Emergency access procedure is an addressable implementation specification under the HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR §164.312(a)(2)(ii)). Organizations must assess whether it is reasonable and appropriate, and if not, document why and implement an equivalent alternative. Since it is addressable, not required, it does not meet the question's requirement for a required specification.

  • ✗

    Automatic logoff

    Why it's wrong here

    Automatic logoff is an addressable implementation specification (45 CFR §164.312(a)(2)(iii)). Covered entities must evaluate its applicability and either implement it or document why it is not reasonable and appropriate, and implement an equivalent control. Because it is addressable, it is not a required implementation specification, so it is incorrect for this scenario.

  • ✗

    Encryption and decryption

    Why it's wrong here

    Encryption and decryption is an addressable implementation specification for access control (45 CFR §164.312(a)(2)(iv)). While it is a strong security measure, it is not required outright; organizations can choose not to implement it if they document why it is not reasonable and appropriate and implement an equivalent alternative. Thus, it does not satisfy the requirement for a required specification.

  • ✓

    Unique user identification

    Why this is correct

    Under the HIPAA Security Rule, unique user identification is a required implementation specification for access control (45 CFR §164.312(a)(2)(i)). It mandates that each user accessing ePHI be assigned a unique identifier to track activity and enforce accountability. This is not optional; it must be implemented to comply with the rule, making it the correct choice for this scenario.

About these practice questions

One of 973 original CAS-005 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official CompTIA exam blueprint

This CAS-005 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAS-005 exam.