Question 177 of 997
System HardeningmediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

CKS System Hardening Practice Question

This CKS practice question tests your understanding of system hardening. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are valid methods to apply a seccomp profile to a pod in Kubernetes?

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Setting 'securityContext.seccompProfile.type' in the pod spec

Option A is correct because the `securityContext.seccompProfile.type` field in the pod spec is the current, stable method to apply a seccomp profile to a pod in Kubernetes (since v1.19). This field directly specifies the seccomp profile type (e.g., `RuntimeDefault`, `Localhost`, or `Unconfined`) at the container or pod level, and is the recommended approach in modern clusters.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Setting 'securityContext.seccompProfile.type' in the pod spec

    Why this is correct

    This is the current recommended way.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Adding annotation 'container.apparmor.security.beta.kubernetes.io/<container>'

    Why it's wrong here

    This is for AppArmor, not seccomp.

  • Including 'seccomp' profile in PodSecurityPolicy

    Why it's wrong here

    PodSecurityPolicy is deprecated and removed in v1.25.

  • Including 'seccompProfile' under 'spec.securityContext' at the pod level

    Why it's wrong here

    seccompProfile is a container-level field, not pod-level.

  • Adding annotation 'seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/pod'

    Why this is correct

    This is the older alpha annotation method.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

CNCF often tests the distinction between deprecated/removed features (like PodSecurityPolicy) and current stable APIs, and the trap here is that candidates confuse the old annotation-based approach (`seccomp.security.alpha.kubernetes.io/pod`) with the modern `securityContext.seccompProfile.type` field, or mistake AppArmor annotations for seccomp annotations.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under the hood, seccomp profiles are loaded into the kernel via the `prctl()` system call, and Kubernetes uses the `seccomp` field in the container runtime spec (CRI) to instruct the runtime (e.g., containerd) to apply the profile. The `RuntimeDefault` profile, for example, uses the Docker/containerd default seccomp profile that blocks around 44 syscalls, balancing security and compatibility. A real-world scenario where this matters is when running untrusted workloads: using `Localhost` with a custom profile can block dangerous syscalls like `mount` or `clone` while allowing necessary ones like `read` and `write`.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CKS exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CKS practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CKS practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CKS question test?

System Hardening — This question tests System Hardening — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Setting 'securityContext.seccompProfile.type' in the pod spec — Option A is correct because the `securityContext.seccompProfile.type` field in the pod spec is the current, stable method to apply a seccomp profile to a pod in Kubernetes (since v1.19). This field directly specifies the seccomp profile type (e.g., `RuntimeDefault`, `Localhost`, or `Unconfined`) at the container or pod level, and is the recommended approach in modern clusters.

What should I do if I get this CKS question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 30, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CKS practice question is part of Courseiva's free CNCF certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CKS exam.