Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: In a VRF-Lite network, redistribution is…

In a VRF-Lite network, redistribution is configured between OSPF and EIGRP. The engineer notices that some routes are being redistributed in a loop, causing instability. The network uses route tagging, but the loop persists. Which is the most likely explanation?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The seed metric for EIGRP is set to a low value (e.g., 1), causing the redistributed route to be preferred over the original OSPF route, leading to a loop.

Mutual redistribution can cause routing loops if routes are not properly tagged and filtered. However, even with tags, if the seed metric is not set correctly, the redistributed route may have a lower metric than the original, causing it to be preferred and re-redistributed. The edge case here is that the seed metric for EIGRP (default is infinity) must be set, but if set too low, it can cause loops. Additionally, if the same prefix exists in both protocols, the administrative distance comparison may cause the redistributed route to be preferred over the original, leading to a loop.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The route tag is not being propagated correctly because OSPF uses a 32-bit tag and EIGRP uses a 32-bit tag, but the tag is lost during redistribution.

    Why it's wrong here

    Both OSPF and EIGRP support 32-bit tags, and tags are preserved across redistributions if configured properly.

  • The seed metric for EIGRP is set to a low value (e.g., 1), causing the redistributed route to be preferred over the original OSPF route, leading to a loop.

    Why this is correct

    If the seed metric is too low, the redistributed route may have a lower composite metric than the original, causing it to be selected and re-redistributed, creating a loop.

  • The administrative distance of OSPF (110) is lower than EIGRP (90), so the redistributed route is always preferred.

    Why it's wrong here

    EIGRP has a lower AD (90) than OSPF (110), so EIGRP routes are preferred. This can cause loops, but the issue is more about metric than AD.

  • The 'redistribute connected' command is used under OSPF, which redistributes all connected interfaces, including the loopback used for router ID.

    Why it's wrong here

    Redistributing connected interfaces can cause issues, but it is not the primary cause of a loop in mutual redistribution.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.