Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: DMVPN spoke-to-spoke tunnel failures are…

DMVPN spoke-to-spoke tunnel failures are occurring due to route summarization. Hub router R1 has:

interface Tunnel0
 ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
 ip nhrp network-id 1
 ip nhrp map multicast dynamic

tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode gre multipoint !

router eigrp 100
 network 172.16.0.0

! Spoke R2 has:

interface Tunnel0
 ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.0
 ip nhrp network-id 1
 ip nhrp nhs 172.16.0.1

tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode gre multipoint ! R1 also has:

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 ip summary-address eigrp 100 10.0.0.0 255.255.252.0

! Spokes cannot establish direct tunnels to each other for subnets within 10.0.0.0/22. What is the root cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The summary route causes spokes to forward traffic to the hub instead of establishing direct tunnels, as the summary is preferred over more specific routes.

The summary route 10.0.0.0/22 is advertised by R1 to all spokes. When a spoke wants to reach a subnet within that summary on another spoke, it sends traffic to R1 (the summary route) instead of using the NHRP redirect to establish a spoke-to-spoke tunnel. The summary overrides the more specific routes that would trigger NHRP redirects. The fix is to use a leak-map to advertise specific routes or disable summarization.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The summary route causes spokes to forward traffic to the hub instead of establishing direct tunnels, as the summary is preferred over more specific routes.

    Why this is correct

    Spokes use the summary route to reach the hub, bypassing NHRP redirect.

  • NHRP is not configured correctly on the spokes, so they cannot register.

    Why it's wrong here

    Spokes are registered with the NHS.

  • EIGRP is not enabled on the tunnel interface, so routes are not exchanged.

    Why it's wrong here

    EIGRP is enabled via network command.

  • The tunnel mode is not multipoint on the spokes.

    Why it's wrong here

    Spokes use multipoint GRE.

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.